My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-13-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2020
>
01-13-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2020 3:24:24 PM
Creation date
3/20/2020 11:07:17 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 9, 2019 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Walsh agreed it was possible. <br />Johnson said it would have to be approved by the Council. What he likes about denying it on the City <br />land is, there are quite a few more interior lots. This applicant owns two. From what he can tell, one of <br />them is for sale. He does not know if they are putting both in there, but the City could be looking for a <br />place for a second dock. <br />Walsh stated it wouldn't be the City. <br />Johnson said now there's an ordinance in place that says they can put a dock there, but the other ones that <br />are in the interior are muted by the fact that they're owned by people that have lakeshore. The ones to the <br />north are owned by people that already have their lake access through their own lot so it's not an issue, but <br />at some point, it could become an issue. He asked what the City would do if there are six interior lots <br />demanding a spot for their boat. <br />Council members gave opinions on whether that is allowed, it could be requested or approved. <br />Walsh stated the City land is not a feasible place to put a dock. <br />Johnson agreed and said that is why there is some latitude within that ordinance about the City saying <br />where it can be and they can approve it and it's annually renewable and can be cancelled by the City. He <br />wanted everybody to be mindful that there are other ones there. <br />Walsh said that is why the City needs to sculpt the language very tightly as far as what it applies to. <br />Johnson noted the property owner would need cooperation from the LMCD. <br />Walsh stated the City can't solve that issue. He said if that gives them lake right access, then they should <br />be able to get a dock from the LMCD. <br />Printup asked if there is anything the City should do to make it very clear why the City does not want it in <br />the City Right -of -Way, such as the danger and the barges and the flow of traffic. <br />Walsh noted at the Planning Commission a lot of the neighbors said, because of the width, if you put a <br />dock there, a barge bringing materials there could get there but they would probably be parking on private <br />property. Then there are issues with barges going on private property versus the access that's supposed to <br />be for them, and who can and can't go on the dock. <br />Johnson added there's power lines and dock storage issues. <br />Walsh confirmed there's power lines under the water in the mud and said if someone hit one of those, who <br />knows what could possibly happen. He does not think anything shows or anyone knows where that is <br />located under the water. <br />Crosby asked if Walsh wanted the City to draft something on this item. <br />Page 22 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.