Laserfiche WebLink
To:'Wes Sampson <br /> Subject: RE: SYS Encroachment? <br /> Wes <br /> I don't think I responded to this. Your drawing looks good. It appears that the overhang of the deck/roof meets the <br /> intent of the nonencroachment provisions. <br /> Melanie Curtis 2 952.249.4627 mcurtisCaci.orono.mn.us <br /> From: Wes Sampson [mailto:wsampson@sharrattdesign.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 9:20 AM <br /> To: Melanie Curtis <br /> Subject: RE: SYS Encroachment? <br /> Melanie: <br /> This is what we are proposing, enclosed a rough section cut and partial elevation. What do you think? <br /> From: Melanie Curtis [ma iIto:MCurtis@ci.orono.mn.us] <br /> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 4:48 PM <br /> To: Wes Sampson <br /> Subject: RE: SYS Encroachment? <br /> The setback is measured to the foundation or wall. From that a 2' roof overhang is allowed to encroach into the setback. <br /> A deck would need to meet the required setback, but I'm not exactly sure how what you're describing lays out... any <br /> chance you could shoot me a rough elevation/side sketch? <br /> Melanie Curtis 2 952.249.4627 �-< mcurtisCaci.orono.mmus <br /> From: Wes Sampson [mailto:wsampson@sharrattdesign.com] <br /> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 4:33 PM <br /> To: Melanie Curtis <br /> Subject: SYS Encroachment? <br /> Melanie: <br /> I am working on an addition/remodel and wonder: <br /> • Would you would consider a roof deck one story above grade with an integrated gutter/fascia/guardrail applied <br /> to the face of the wall below which is just behind the 10' sideyard setback to be an encroachment?This would <br /> not protrude much more than 8" from the face of the wall below and the bottom would not be much more than <br /> 12" below the top of the roof. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Wes Sampson <br /> Wes Sampson <br /> Sharratt Design & Company <br /> 464 Second Street- Suite 100 <br /> Excelsior, MN 55331 <br /> Main: 952-470-9750 <br /> E-Fax: 952-767-5888 <br /> wsampson(cDsharrattdesign.com <br /> 2 <br />