Laserfiche WebLink
M, <br /> r <br /> ;. 31. The granting of the required variances would result in <br /> the following violations of Section 32. 340 of the Zoning Code with <br /> which the applicant must first comply before the required variances <br /> can be granted: <br /> a. The variances would have E..n adverse effect upon <br /> + the health, safety and welfare of the community <br /> for the reasons outlined herein. <br /> b. The safety and welfare of the community would <br /> be adversely affected for the reasons outlined <br /> herein, especially increased traffic and drainage <br /> a problems. <br /> C. The amount of light and ai in the neighborhood <br /> would be diminished by adcing a structure on the <br /> substandard lot. <br /> d. The values of surrounding )roperties will be r <br /> adversely affected. <br /> e. There are no special condi.-ions applying to the <br /> land in question which are peculiar to the land <br /> or immediately adjoining p.-operty. 4,',t <br /> a <br /> f. The condition of having a :,ubstandard lot or two <br /> adjacent substandard lots `field in common applies <br /> generally in the lakeshore residential districts. <br /> i <br /> g. The granting of the applic�.-ion is not necessary .` <br /> for the preservation and e:.joyment of a substantial <br /> property right of the appl ;ant. ` hal <br /> h. The granting of the variances will impair the <br /> hearth, safety, comfort anc' be contrary to the <br /> intent of the Zoning Code n.nd Comprehensive Plan. <br /> i. The granting of the variances will serve merely as <br /> a convenience to the applicant, and is not necessary <br /> ' to alleviate demonstrable 'r_ardship or difficulty. <br /> 32. The applicant has not introduced any evidence contrary <br /> to any of the above findings of fact. 'Ihe v-plicant has claimed <br /> r only that Lot 3 would be of greater value to i:im if he could sell <br /> Page 5 of 6 ' <br /> P, <br /> a` ' <br /> ,„ <br /> , .-.. <br /> � � g#? � <br /> �'. # �" �' �. <br />