Control # 581...variance denial - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

y ' "'MANN P ' 67: 22. Lorge sold Lot 4 , but not Lot 3, to Jerome iteinan on May 29, 1980, thereby separating the parcels for the First time dard and since 1920 and thereby making bottGuiorementst 3 daL; enumeratednabove. deficient in regarls to zoning re , - .% 23. Lorqe applied on August 29,. 195. for a lot width ' variance for Lot 3, but not for any other vai : ances, stating as �� a ailable" . a hardship that there was no adjacent land the Lorqe sale of Lot on May 29, 1980, hfi Prior t o 24. there was adjacent land available to Lot 3 in the form of Lot 4 which historically had bee, owned in common wzth Lot 3. ` d not te 25. Denial of thessuob3substantect ialevalue, because oLot 13uhas a taking of property or los Y , always had value and been used as required area and yard space for �t- the residence on Lot ` 26. Any hardship resulting from the separate ownership of Lot 3 has been caused by the applicant's sale of adjacent Lot 4 common ownership by the ap both lots and icar,t or eight years after c applicable minimum, zoning s ears after the adoption of the app _ � . thirteen y requirements. dentir! 27 . The developmantoo�heoexistingrdrainageaproblemsefor s proposed by Lorge would ad owned by Lot 4, previously ' the properties in the area, including '& Lorge. i 28. The granting of the variances .,ould be .7dverse to nnhe r i state promulgated low density shorelands development policy, 75 Stat. §105.485, Subd. 1, which callsfor a reationa nDevelopmentwidth Lakefsuch r feet on a General Development or Rec as Lake Minnetonka. , 29. Section 31. 202 of the Zoning Cade provides for F development of lots of record held in separate ownership since prior to the effective date of the zoning regulation, provided the Lot 3 does not lot of record meets 80% of the requirE,d lot width. conform to this Section because it is only z'0with Lot 4ebetween o width and because it was in common ownershil 1967 and 1980. x; Council has always rccuired that when two or 30. The City mus individuali1 meet or " ' more lots are owned in common, each lot OCode ore any of the 1°'s 4• exceed the requirements of the 'zoning ';.". ard can be built upon and that two or , ore subs -ar'combinedJlotnmeetn common must be combined so that the resulti ;g the requirements of the 'Coning Code before ie lots can be built { upon. �v Paye 4 D 14 rsF i x'r M- •^A 711-77- in n mimF 1. r hzC�r r`'aa°� ':'�5ei 1y-f gAmar+�,:.-zB�P'' ^a.k �qX•i+b7� ��`:`,""' .$.: .�' t'Y., '. o w ..�h.,F_ ,.n '� ,� �_,k� ,..