2016 - 00599 - pool- in ground - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

td' 02 • PERIMETER D -�r'i_1~C7'10 TEST . The perimeter deflection est was conducted on both Cover-Pool safely covers in accordance with section 9.' of ASTM ES 13. nth a 50 lb. weight placed 4' from the edge of the pool on top of he safety cover, the test object was unable to pass through any opening at the perimeter of the pool. 8 th Cover-Pool safety covers met the performance requirements or the perimeter de action test as outlined in ASTM ES 13 section 7.2. SURFACE DRAINAGE TE T On June 12, 1990, the su co drainage test w s conducted on a Cover-Pool safety cover which was installed o a local private pool. The tracking system was an under track system. The pool d nslons were 14.17'x42.5'. The surface drainage test was conducted In accordance wi ASTM ES 13 section 9.3. Water was applied evenly at a rate of 11.7 gpm per 1000 sq. ft. A small sump pump, with discharge capacity of 20 gpm, was placed at one en of the safety cover with the discharge hose snaking the ength of the pool, on top of e safety cover, anc discharging at the opposite end from he pump. The water was a.plied for 30 minutes with the pump on and In place. The water was then shut off and e pump was allowed to run for an additional 30 minutes. The test mannequin (Timmy was then placed u on the safety cover. At the end of 3 minutes after placing Tim upon the safety ver, an unsafe amount of water as described in ASTM ES 13 se ion 9.3,1 did not ex st. The Cover-Pool safety cover met the safety requirements as o dined in ASTM ES 3 section 7.3. All safety covers and equipment test:d were standard as provided by Cover-Pools inc. Safety covers were installed according to Cover-Pd.fs, Inc. standard in'tallatton criteria. inspector; Jerry Mall f1eaA.T1 ,MMJGEu{MY TO Puma*mann TC$TEO. R[POHT1 Y NOT ON RV0004/C10.INCEPT N rug„YNOtooT YYfpTTNN + -• • NY Pet Nc• Reapea ully submitted, Proross ono! Servk'e lndustrlas, Inc. Arty G. Hall daps ant Manager TOTAL P.02