Laserfiche WebLink
O <br /> O <br /> t_: to, CITY of ORONO <br /> ArI v. O~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �9kESH�g� NO. 3 6 9 <br /> proposed subdivision configuration creates a "front lot" and a "back lot" per the <br /> definitions in the Subdivision Code (Ordinance No. 122, Second Series), and the <br /> newly created lots are subject to the lot area, lot width and structural setback <br /> standards of Subdivision Code Section 11.30, Subdivision 5 (C). This section <br /> would require the platting of an "access outlot" as a separate tax parcel adjacent <br /> to the "front lot" leading to the "back lot". <br /> 6. Section 11.30, Subdivision 5 (C) requires that the "access outlot" be 30' in width. <br /> That same Code section requires that the "back lot" contain 150% of the minimum <br /> zoning district required lot area. The LR-1A Zoning District required lot area is <br /> 2.0 acres. Under the proposed configuration incorporating the required 30' wide <br /> "access outlot", proposed Lot 1 (the "front lot") would contain 0.76 acres where <br /> a 2.0 acre lot area is required; and proposed Lot 2 (the "back lot' ) would contain <br /> 1.09 acres in area where 150% of the two acre standard, or 3.0 acres, is required. <br /> 7. Proposed Lots 1 and 2 meet the 200' required lot width at all required locations <br /> with the exception that proposed Lot 2 is only 190' in width at the street setback <br /> where a 200' width is normally required. <br /> 8. The property is within the Shoreland Overlay District and is subject to hardcover <br /> limitations. The proposed "access outlot" is in the 75-250' zone where only 25% <br /> hardcover is normally allowed. Hardcover in the "access outlot" as proposed <br /> would be 35.0%. a 10% hardcover variance. The proposed construction on Lots <br /> 1 and 2 would not incorporate any hardcover into the 0-75' setback zone where no <br /> hardcover is normally allowed, but a variance for 28.8% hardcover where 25% <br /> hardcover is allowed would be necessary for the proposed construction on <br /> proposed Lot 1. <br /> 9. The proposed subdivision would create two extremely substandard lots from three <br /> existing record lots which individually are currently unbuildable without many <br /> variances. The three existing lots have historically been used as a single property. <br /> There are a number of non-conformities attributable to the existing lots: <br /> a. Each of the three existing lots is less than the required two acre minimum <br /> lot area requirement [Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B)]. <br /> Page 3 of 9 <br />