My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-25-2019 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2019
>
11-25-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/26/2019 4:22:20 PM
Creation date
12/26/2019 4:20:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Tuesday, November 12, 2019 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />Barnhart said currently it is guided for 3-10 units per acre and it was developed at about 5. In the <br />development shown, the guiding range is 20-25 units an acre and comes in at about 22-23 units an acre. <br />Crosby asked whether the guiding was 5. <br />Walsh stated 5 was the amount approved previously. <br />Walsh asked if the applicant had anything to add. <br />Mr. Curt Fretham, Lake West Development, said his company is wrestling with the cleanup portion of <br />what was approved for the high-density component, recognizing that the cleanup on the north portion on <br />the phase being presented is going to be more economical to clean up. They thought it would get their feet <br />wet to find out what there really is for cleanup because there will be some cleanup on the western edge of <br />that proposed building. He is looking for feedback if the Council can support the density change or not. <br />Walsh asked if there was anybody who wanted to talk about the item. <br />Mr. Tony Sarenpa, local resident, stated he is in favor of the higher density proposal, stating why not do a <br />little more if it is already higher density, that it makes sense. <br />Crosby asked why he would be in favor of it. <br />Mr. Sarenpa stated if it is right next door to it, it seems to make sense, rather than break it up. <br />Crosby commented that it is basically replacing what he was proposing earlier. <br />Mr. Sarenpa clarified whether he meant with detached homes. <br />Walsh stated the density where the landfill site is, he is moving it over there. <br />Mr. Sarenpa reiterated that it made sense to him. <br />Barnhart, using a map, stated the applicant is proposing to keep the 20-25 units the same and then <br />indicated the area where the applicant would like to add higher density. <br />Ms. Stacey Royal, 3135 Jamestown Road, said she was against the 244 units; she thought it was a little <br />too much for the area. Now 127 units is being proposed for this, and she thinks that is still a lot. There is <br />not a complex that size in this area. She commented the resident that was talking with the developers <br />beforehand maybe has more information about the development. The townhomes increase it already to 27 <br />units, which could be 3-4 people per unit so that already increases the numbers. She does not think a high- <br />density apartment complex is great for the area, based on the facts there are schools there, the driveway <br />would be right by the main school driveway that's used to get into the activity center, and there are <br />already traffic issues on old Highway 12 and Highway 6 during school hours. She understands density has <br />to be done someplace but does not know if it is the best place because it is by the schools. <br />Walsh noted the Council went through a lot of thoughtful discussion on how to zone and guide the area <br />and feels the density along that corridor was a very nice development and it was kind of an afterthought <br />when the Council said, Where the dump site is, if you can figure that out, you can put some extra density <br />Page 13 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.