Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Tuesday, November 12, 2019 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />Walsh noted it's a process starting with the Planning Commission, neighbors have reached out, Council <br />members have talked about it and have been to the site and the City Council is trying to make sure the <br />right thing is done for the long-term, not just whether the neighbors like it or not. <br />Mr. Bonnett agreed with Walsh. <br />Walsh stated the City needs cooperation from Bonnett and if he is willing to take direction from Staff and <br />figure out the best spot and then the pathway from there, it could be tabled. He could meet with them and <br />then come back with a new plan for everybody to look at again. <br />Crosby agreed that would be the way to go. <br />Mr. Bonnett agreed to table the matter. <br />Printup moved, Crosby seconded, to table the matter. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />RECESS AND RECONVENE <br />The meeting recessed at 7:04 p.m. and reconvened at 7:10 p.m. <br />21. LA19-000078 — LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT, 3245 WAYZATA BLVD W, SKETCH <br />PLAN REVIEW <br />Barnhart presented a Sketch Plan Review for a proposed development on Wayzata Boulevard. He stated <br />in 2016-2017 Eisinger Meadows was reviewed by the City Council, a 27 -unit townhome type of <br />development on the subject property. Last fall the Council reviewed a sketch plan for a large <br />condominium in the area that was previously a landfill. During the development of the larger attached <br />family dwelling unit last year, the applicant discovered the costs associated with that development were <br />higher than expected and is looking at other options. One of the options is, instead of doing the Eisinger <br />Meadows townhome-type development, to do some higher density along Wayzata Boulevard. The <br />Comprehensive Plan that was just completed guided this area for 3-10 units an acre, consistent with the <br />Eisinger Meadows project, but not consistent with a development of this scale. <br />Barnhart asked if the Council has any appetite to add higher density to the northern portion of the Eisinger <br />property and likely a use similar to a detached family apartment or condominium building. During review <br />Staff did not spend a lot of time on site development or architecture of the building, partly because the <br />same comments that were generated at that time still hold true. If Council wants anything specific <br />changed, Council should let Staff know. The Planning Commission reviewed this last month and <br />generally supported the adding of density, noting it's probably the best location for density because it is <br />far away from any other residential use and surrounded by Wayzata Boulevard to the north and Highway <br />12 to the south. He stated the applicants are present. There are two questions: 1) If the Council is <br />interested in adding density there; 2) Whether there is or isn't, are there any changes the Council would <br />like to make to the rest of the property. <br />Johnson asked what the proposed density per acre was. <br />Page 12 of 17 <br />