My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-14-2019 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
10-14-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2019 1:10:15 PM
Creation date
11/4/2019 12:58:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
326
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 23, 2019 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 3 of 11 <br /> <br />Osmek indicated the committee did have a discussion about the gas tax and how that was supposed to go <br />toward roads and bridges. There is some leakage, however, that goes into snowmobile clubs because the <br />thinking is that snowmobilers buy gas and pay that tax and it was felt some of that money should go <br />towards trails. It is the same situation with boats. The committee has been keeping an eye on where that <br />money is going but Minnesota did not need a gas tax this year and does not need one next year. Osmek <br />indicated he will continue fighting any increase in Minnesota’s current 28.5 cents gas tax. <br /> <br />Crosby asked how much of that money was diverted to light rail. <br /> <br />Osmek noted the light rail system did have an increase in revenue and an increase in ridership but that it is <br />still heavily funded by the taxpayers. <br /> <br />Osmek stated he also wanted to talk about the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District bill since people <br />are misrepresenting it. The bill was never going to increase density on the lake. The LMCD has not <br />performed a density study since 2004, and if they feel there is a density issue, why have they not done <br />anther study to look at it. The bill was designed to allow the cities to be in control of their land <br />management and to not let the LMCD board, which consists of 13 unelected people, telling cities what <br />they can do with noise and traffic issues. Osmek stated he is not going to hand over land authority to 13 <br />people who do not live in his town and do not represent him and that the cities should keep their <br />authority. <br /> <br />Osmek stated he also had representatives in his office from the Metropolitan Council. In Minnesota there <br />a lot of cities that are the same size as Orono or smaller. A number of those cities are already built up <br />and they will not be rezoning any land or putting in new developments. Osmek indicated he will be <br />getting together with the Metropolitan Council in October and the goal is to put together a methodology <br />that says if your zoning has not changed by more than 10 percent, then you do not have to do a <br />Comprehensive Plan Update. The Metropolitan Council agrees with that and they will be working on a <br />bill to help cities not have to go through that exercise. Hopefully by next year that will be worked out. <br /> <br />FINANCE DIRECTOR REPORT <br /> <br />13. ADOPT 2020 PRELIMINARY TAX LEVY <br /> <br />Olson stated by state law the City is required to adopt a preliminary property tax levy by September 30. <br />The truth-in-taxation meeting will be held December 9 at 6:30 p.m., with the final levy being adopted that <br />evening. Once the preliminary levy is set, it cannot be increased, and it can only be decreased. <br /> <br />The property tax levy consists of three components. The first is the operating levy, which is adopted to <br />fund the general fund operating budget. The second part is the Pavement Management Levy that is <br />needed to fund the City’s Pavement Maintenance Plan. The final levy component is for the debt service <br />of the City’s outstanding bonds. <br /> <br />The City’s revenue budget is now around $9,143,000, which is a 6.6 percent increase over last year. As it <br />relates to total intragovernmental revenue, new regulations do not allow cities to net grant money and it <br />now has to be recorded as revenue and the expenditures need to be recorded, which is what largely <br />constituted the increase in revenue. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.