My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-28-2019 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2019
>
05-28-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2019 9:50:39 AM
Creation date
9/24/2019 9:49:04 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETEING <br />Monday, MAY 13, 2019 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />Walsh noted the City Council discussed this at a work session and it is their belief it fits pretty well with <br />the City's overall philosophy. <br />Crosby moved, Printup seconded, to approve the city mission and vision statements and goals. <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />28. PROPOSAL TO PURCHASE PID#34-118-23-32-0051 <br />Rief stated the City of Orono owns Parcel ID 3411823320051 located between 340 Willow Drive and the <br />Long Lake municipal boundary on the east. A interested party was looking to do a development on these <br />three parcels. During that process, Staff identified this lot as being city -owned and the party is here <br />tonight to ask what the Council's opinion is of the lot. If the Council is interested in possibly selling this <br />lot, the second step would be to determine pricing for the lot. <br />Walsh noted the developer has not brought forward any formal proposal, so discussion on this item might <br />be a little premature. Walsh suggested the developer bring a proposal forward and then the City Council <br />can discuss it. <br />Walsh noted the City's donation garden is located on that property and that he would like to hear from <br />that group tonight as well as in the fall. Walsh commented the community garden is a great asset. <br />Printup noted previously there was a proposal for some density housing for this area, which was not too <br />different from what is being proposed. When that area was developed, there was an Option 3 in 2011, <br />which was to designate the city -owned property as a park. Printup stated it was important to him at that <br />time to call that piece of land a park. In addition, the City has a vision statement that they just approved <br />tonight. Printup stated while that area is very small, it is still one of Orono's parks, and he is not <br />interested in selling city land in general because it opens the City up to different things. <br />Printed noted there was a license agreement for the community garden but that agreement was not <br />included in the packet that was delivered prior to the weekend but it has been made available today. That <br />license agreement is in place until 2022. While the City still has ownership of the land and can pull that <br />agreement with 90 days' notice, he would like to extend the agreement past 2022, which would make a <br />bold statement that the City is not interested in selling this piece of land. <br />Crosby noted the fire department also utilizes that parcel for training purposes and that he agrees with <br />Council Member Printup. The residents of Orono want open space and the City can control what happens <br />on city -owned land. Crosby asked what would stop the City of Orono from calling it the Fireman's Park <br />to honor past firefighters who have served the Orono community as well as keeping the community <br />garden. <br />Seals stated the City Council should be completely bold and say they are absolutely not interested in <br />selling the land. If the City has to have high density, that can be done along Old Highway 12, and that the <br />City Council does not have any intention of letting the density creep. Seals indicated she was a little <br />taken aback when the City of Long Lake showed her this plan and that the City Council should make it <br />clear that they want certain areas left as open, green spaces, and place higher density elsewhere. <br />Barnhart stated from a land use perspective, the City has identified this area for medium density housing. <br />While the Council has the ability to dictate land use, if this area remains green space, it will be necessary <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.