My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Re: request for council action/subdivision
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
W
>
Watertown Road
>
3020 Watertown Rd - 33-118-23-33-0001
>
Correspondence
>
Re: request for council action/subdivision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:49:48 PM
Creation date
7/24/2019 1:28:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3020
Street Name
Watertown
Street Type
Road
Address
3020 Watertown Road
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
3311823330001
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
#2466 Renckens & Winston <br /> May 21, 1999 <br /> Page 5 <br /> 5. Applicants cite Section 11.32, Sub. 2(B)(4) which states "Roadways shall be laid out to <br /> conform as much as possible to the topography, to discourage use by through traffic, to <br /> permit efficient drainage and utility systems, and to require the minimum number of <br /> roadways necessary to provide convenient and safe access to property." Applicants believe <br /> that the 50' corridor along the boundary will encourage through traffic. However,through <br /> traffic is not traffic generated by or within the neighborhood, but traffic using the <br /> neighborhood road as a shortcut. This is hardly the case where a horseshoe shaped road is <br /> anticipated, but might be the case if connections to Old Crystal Bay Road are made. <br /> However, convenient and safe access to property is best provided by roads that have <br /> more than one outlet, not by long cul-de-sacs (1400' in the case of Crystal Creek, or 140% <br /> of the City's maximum cul-de-sac length standard of 1000' per Section 11.33 Subd. 4)nor <br /> by extremely long private driveways. <br /> 6. Applicants cite Section 11.32 Subd. 2(B)(6) which states in full " Cul-de-sacs shall be <br /> discouraged;proposed roadways shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be <br /> subdivided(exactly what was done with Crystal Creek), unless prevented by topography or <br /> other physical conditions(the 6-12%slope directly east of Crystal Creek's cul-de-sac poses <br /> no engineering problems for extending Crystal Creek Road,although it may not be what the <br /> applicant envisions as appropriate), or unless in the opinion of the City such extension is not <br /> necessary or desirable for the coordination of the layout of the subdivision with the the <br /> existing layout or the most advantageous future development of adjacent tracts". <br /> In staff s opinion this entire code section is very relevant and applicable to the Renckens <br /> proposal. This section provides the City with the basis for making logical sense of road <br /> systems between and through adjacent subdivisions. <br /> 7. Section 11.32 Subd. 6(H) "Construction of Roads and Dead-end Roads" is key to this <br /> discussion. It states: <br /> "1. Construction of Roads. The arrangement of streets shall provide for the <br /> continuation of streets between adjacent properties when such continuation <br /> is necessary for convenient movement of traffic, effective fire protection,for <br /> efficient provision of utilities, and where such continuation is in accordance <br /> with the City Comprehensive Municipal Plan. If the adjacent property is <br /> undeveloped and the street must be a dead-end street temporarily, the right <br /> of way shall be extended to the property line. The City may limit the length <br /> of temporary dead-end streets in accordance with the design standards of this <br /> Chapter. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.