My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC minutes 4-12-99
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
W
>
Watertown Road
>
3020 Watertown Road - 33-118-23-33-0001
>
Misc
>
CC minutes 4-12-99
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:49:47 PM
Creation date
7/24/2019 1:22:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3020
Street Name
Watertown
Street Type
Road
Address
3020 Watertown Road
Document Type
Misc
PIN
3311823330001
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> ME4UTES FOR APRIL 12, 1999 <br /> (#9) #2466 James Renckens,having an interest in 3020 Watertown Road-Continued <br /> Renckens said this parcel has a lot of appeal.He is concerned about the future development <br /> of the area if the outlot is made into a road. He does not want to be in a busy area. <br /> Sansevere asked about the septic alternatives if the 50.' outlot is created. <br /> Renckens said the septic site is in the northeast comer of the site.He said the alternative is to <br /> remove the trees in the middle of the site.The only other septic site is near the wetland. The <br /> wetland has to be extended with a ponding area which will eliminate that septic site. <br /> Kelley asked staff how access would be gained to Watertown Road if the property was <br /> subdivided further. <br /> Weinberger stated that only two residences are allowed on a shared private driveway. Access <br /> for the northerly lot would have to be via the cul-de-sac on Crystal Creek Road. <br /> Mike Hilbelink stated that none of the property owners in the area are in favor of the 50' <br /> outlot except for Mr. Carlson. He said the City didn't take the outlot at the time of the Crystal <br /> Creek Subdivision and it appears to him that the reason was to preserve septic sites and two <br /> lots for Mr. Carlson. Mr. Hilbelink feels Mr. Carlson will benefit from the outlot and the <br /> burden is being put on the person developing this parcel. He said if this parcel had already <br /> been developed at the time of the Crystal Creek Subdivision,the outlot would have had to go <br /> to the north and Mr. Carlson would have lost two lots. <br /> Carlson stated that the road was put where City staff wanted it put. He was promised a 50' <br /> outlot across the top of the Stubbs property and he wants it. <br /> Flint asked about Mr. Carlson creating his own problem when he sold off Lots 6 and 7 since <br /> that is what isolated his northern property. <br /> Carlson said Lots 6 and 7 were part of the entire plat and there weren't any problems with <br /> septic sites. He again stated that he put the road where the City wanted it and he does not <br /> want to be denied access to his 30 acres. <br /> Hilbelink said this parcel could.be sold and not subdivided.If that happened,the outlot could <br /> not be created. <br /> Kelley asked if Gaffron was involved in the Crystal Creek subdivision. <br /> Gaffron said he had some involvement in the subdivision. <br /> Kelley asked what the staffs position was from a long-term planning point of view. <br /> Page 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).