My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC minutes 4-12-99
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
W
>
Watertown Road
>
3020 Watertown Rd - 33-118-23-33-0001
>
Misc
>
CC minutes 4-12-99
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:49:47 PM
Creation date
7/24/2019 1:22:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3020
Street Name
Watertown
Street Type
Road
Address
3020 Watertown Road
Document Type
Misc
PIN
3311823330001
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> MINUTES FOR APRIL 12, 1999 <br /> (0) #2466 James Renckens,having an interest in 3020 Watertown Road-Continued <br /> away from him so he could develop the lots,he gained economic benefit from that and now <br /> he wants additional benefit from the 50' outlot.He said that the subdivision for Crystal Creek <br /> states that the subdivider is responsible for providing legal access to the property to the north. <br /> Renckens said he does not want to lose the septic sites in the northeast corner of the property <br /> that are within the 50' outlot area because he would not be able to put his home in the <br /> northern part of the property. <br /> Kelley said that the City's long-term vision at the time of the Crystal Creek subdivision was <br /> to link Crystal Creek Road with Wear lane. <br /> Sansevere asked if the expectation was to make the link across Mr. Renckens' property or go <br /> into the property above it. <br /> Kelley said the intention was to take it from what is the Stubbs property. <br /> Flint said that the City has also been supportive of people that want to keep cul-de-sacs. <br /> Kelley said that is true,but the roads are usually platted to go all the way through new <br /> subdivisions. <br /> Flint said the City has the legal right to put the roads in,but the City hasn't because the <br /> homeowners on both sides prefer the cul-de-sacs. <br /> Kelley said that is true,but the easements are there so that if the City gets pressure from the <br /> neighbors,the roads can be made public. He said that it is good public policy to take the 50' <br /> outlot. <br /> Sansevere asked if Mr.Renckens was aware of the 50' outlot when he looked into acquiring <br /> the property and if he was hoping the City would override it. <br /> Renckens said he was aware of the issue with the 50' outlot,but he didn't think it applied in <br /> his situation. <br /> Winston said that when they reduced the subdivision from three lots to two lots, it would be a <br /> reasonable basis to eliminate the 50' outlot. He distributed information regarding cul-de-sacs <br /> in the immediate neighborhood of the property that are not connected. <br /> Kelley reviewed the list and stated the reasons why the cul-de-sacs are not connected. <br /> Winston said the point is that there are a number of cul-de-sacs in the area that are not <br /> connected. He said cul-de-sacs are part of the character of the neighborhood and they are <br /> trying to preserve that character. <br /> Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.