My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Re: sewer connection denial
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
W
>
Watertown Road
>
2165 Watertown Road - 03-117-23-21-0026
>
Correspondence
>
Re: sewer connection denial
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:34:25 PM
Creation date
7/16/2019 1:13:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
2165
Street Name
Watertown
Street Type
Road
Address
2165 Watertown Rd
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
0311723210026
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M <br /> • Bruce P. Carlson <br /> 5439 Zumbra Drive <br /> Excelsior, MN 55331 <br /> October 7, 1986 <br /> Orono City Council <br /> City of Orono <br /> P.O. Box 66 <br /> Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br /> RE: REQUEST TO HOOK-UP TO SEWER PROVIDED BY LONG LAKE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM <br /> PROPERTY ADDRESS: 2165 WATERTOWN ROAD, ORONO, MN <br /> Dear Members of the Council : <br /> I am hereby requesting permission from the City of Orono, the right to <br /> connect my proposed new residence at the above-mentioned address, to the <br /> Long Lake City sewer system. <br /> The City of Long Lake has written in their minutes of meeting held on June <br /> 17, 1986: (see attachment) <br /> "The Council further finds that the City of Long Lake is willing to <br /> allow adjacent properties in Orono to connect to its Sanitary Sewer <br /> System in appropriate cases." <br /> O Reasons for sewer: <br /> A. A public sewer system has a greatly reduced probability for problems, <br /> B. public sewer is considered as a permanent system, <br /> C. public sewer is treated with continued upgrading of effluent, <br /> D. public sewer reduces liability of soil contamination to property owner <br /> and municipality, <br /> E. public sewer assures best protection for water and environment quality, <br /> F. phosphates and nitrates are not left in the soils, <br /> G. there are high water tables on the subject property, <br /> H. there are fluctuations in the water table on the subject property, and <br /> after conversations with over 30 people in municipal , county, state, and <br /> federal agencies, the consensus is that sewer is the best and most common <br /> sense answer to this situation. <br /> While most concerned groups are not extremely interested in making sub- <br /> stantiated statements or "getting involved in a municipal matter", my research <br /> in the Industry shows strong favoritism of public sewer over a septic system <br /> as supported by the following: <br /> DNR / Steve Preston / 297-2404 <br /> Sewer is "the preferred system". Public sewer to be used when avaiyfble <br /> or feasible with no differentiation of who owns systems. "Precedence for <br /> public sewer over septic system has been set. <br /> DNR / Howard Kroschr/ 296-0778 a� <br /> Prefers sewer. Precedence has been set for sewer over septic system. <br /> SOCIETY FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING <br /> Sewer is best. <br /> METRO WASTE COMMISSION / Carl Forrester, Engineer / 222-8423 <br /> Preference for sewer. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.