Laserfiche WebLink
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT <br /> W/12/81 <br /> limited geographic areas, such as shorelines, Policies <br /> leaving the regulation of most on-site systems up <br /> to the local governmental units. 38. Thaon*ftWstm maimigement and control <br /> program for4twWlat opoiitan Arm should'be <br /> Following extensive study and analysis, the MPCA .designed to_Rrgt,and promote water <br /> adopted a regulation governing a sizable share of all quality_ d6 otect and-promote <br /> the health, <br /> on-site systems. This regulation, WPC 40 (6 MCAR safety,. d-wel pf all Metropole <br /> _� .. � ton:&ea <br /> 48040), became effective on August 21, 1978. It <br /> applies only to large-scale systems and state facility -,q,.,,+¢�,� ,;,a:,,.. ,,•�. �, _ <br /> installations. The provisions will be used by the 39. The on-site system management and control' <br /> DNR in determining the adequacy of local program for the Metropolitan Area should be <br /> ordinances and programs for shorelands and cost-effective,simple, understandable <br /> floodplains. Nevertheless, most on-site system and sufficiently uniform to ensure simple and <br /> installations are still not regulated by the State of consistent administration throughout the <br /> Minnesota. However, the MPCA and others Metropolitan Area. <br /> recommend that WPC 40 be used as a model for a <br /> local program of on-site system management and 40. The on-site system management and control <br /> control. program for the Metropolitan Area should <br /> promote public and private activities designed <br /> WPC 40 provides an excellent solution to a large to provide for the appropriate utilization of <br /> part of the management and control program needs such systems, minimize the risk of problems <br /> involving on-site systems throughout the state. resulting from the use of such systems,and <br /> correct existing on-site system-related <br /> WPC 40 establishes technical and design require- problems. <br /> ments for new on-site systems, both standard and <br /> alternative types, and their installation. <br /> Phases of a Local On-site Management Program <br /> It does not, however, provide a total solution to <br /> the needs either within the Metropolitan Area or Planning or Preinstallation Phase <br /> elsewhere. The regulation does not deal with <br /> existing on-site systems, including recertification The first step in developing an effective local <br /> of such systems. Nor does it provide for the management program is to relate the use of on-site <br /> monitoring, maintenance or inspection of new systems to a community's general land use pian <br /> systems, or establish provisions for local program and development program, including density <br /> administration, enforcement, remedial actions, of developments. Communities are responsible for <br /> planning, etc. It is important that any management developing a comprehensive development plan <br /> and control program for any part of the state be under the requirements of the Metropolitan Land <br /> consistent with the provisions of WPC 40. Planning Act. A community's land use plan and <br /> Although duplication might be possible, it would land use controls should address the issue of what <br /> be inappropriate and impractical legally to have role on-site systems should plan in a community's <br /> on-site requirements that vary substantially from future development. <br /> those contained in WPC 40. <br /> Rural areas that have and intend to continue rural <br /> An examination of the past history-of on-site development densities (that is, a range of one unit <br /> systems reveals that failures can and do happen. per 10 acres to one per 40 acres) will not be <br /> The existing metropolitan-wide management expected to have as stringent a program covering <br /> structure for on-site systems is perhaps best operation, maintenance and postinstallation <br /> described as loose and uncoordinated, although inspection as rural areas having or proposing urban <br /> there are some exceptions. This combination gives or urban-like development densities (that is, a <br /> the public poor assurance that pollution or public range of one unit per 21/2 to one per five acres). All <br /> health hazards caused by on-site systems will not communities are expected to adopt the require- <br /> occur in the future. ments of WPC 40 for new installations, regardless <br /> of development density (see Table 1). <br /> 22 <br />