My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-19-1999 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
04-19-1999 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 3:03:45 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 3:03:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MINUTES FOR APRIL 19, 1999 <br /> 13. #2481 SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB, 725 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH, REZONING, 8:39 p.m. - <br /> 8:43 p.m. —(cont.) <br /> Smith stated she does not have a problem with this application <br /> Stoddard moved, Berg seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2480, Spring <br /> Hill Golf Club, 725 Sixth Avenue North, for the rezoning of the portion outlined in the <br /> April 14, 1999 Planner's Report from RR-1B-1 to RR-1 B, subject to the conditions contained <br /> in the April 14, 1999 Planner's Report. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> 14. #2482 SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB, 725 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH -CONDITIONAL USE <br /> PERMIT, 8:43 p.m. -8:57 p.m. <br /> The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br /> Tim Johnson, Spring Hill Golf Club Representative, was present. <br /> Gaffron stated at the time of the conditional use permit for the Golf Club, plans showed an existing <br /> Spring Hill caretaker house, which at the time was thought to be likely to be removed. The <br /> conditional use permit did not contain the appropriate language to allow the caretaker house to <br /> be retained. Condition three of Resolution No. 3902 requires an amendment to the conditional use <br /> permit if additional accessory buildings are proposed. Because it will act as a "guest house", the <br /> caretaker house also requires a Guest House Conditional Use Permit. <br /> Gaffron stated the property does meet the required setbacks and lot size requirements to allow <br /> the caretaker house to remain on the property. The Golf Club is proposing to utilize the caretaker <br /> house as a residence for one or more employees of the Club, which would appear to be covered <br /> • under the definition of a "guest House" in Section 10.20 Subdivision 3(G)as an accessory separate <br /> dwelling for the sole use of the occupants of the primary dwelling, including their domestic <br /> employees or their non-paying guests. <br /> City Staff is recommending approval of this application. <br /> Johnson stated this was an oversight on the part of the Golf Course and it has been their intent all <br /> along to retain the caretaker house. <br /> There were no public comments. <br /> Smith commented that to her understanding the caretaker house was to be removed after a period <br /> of time. <br /> Johnson stated there was a farmhouse originally on the property which was removed. The Golf Club <br /> does not intend the caretaker house to be used overnight by its guests but will be occupied at this <br /> time by a caretaker. <br /> Gaffron stated that City Staff is recommending that the caretaker house not be rented out and shall <br /> be occupied only by employees of the Club. <br /> Stoddard commented that in his view the guest house only allows the structure to be occupied by <br /> family members or owners of the property. <br /> Gaffron remarked that the code reads non-paying guests. The City has provided for caretaker units at <br /> marina areas for security in the past, and City Staff is viewing this as the same situation. <br /> • <br /> Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.