Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MINUTES FOR MARCH 15, 1999 <br /> • (#5) #2444 BRIAN AND SUSAN SCHEBLER, 1354 REST POINT CIRCLE -VARIANCE, <br /> 7:33 p.m. -8:02 p.m.—(continued) <br /> Weinberger stated the Applicants are requesting an after-the-fact variance to permit a detached, <br /> ground level deck located on the lakeside of the residence. The deck is located 86 feet from the <br /> Ordinary High Water Level of Lake Minnetonka. <br /> Weinberger stated a number of permits were issued in 1989 to allow for a large addition to the home in <br /> 1989. Following a recent survey by Gronberg, it was determined that some hardcover that was <br /> requested to be removed at that time was still existing. Approval was subject to the previous <br /> property owners removing a gravel parking area on the property and reducing the size of the <br /> driveway. <br /> City Staff recommends that the gravel parking area located on the north part of the property remain <br /> in that it is used for parking by the home owners and provides an area for snow storage. The rock <br /> located around the driveway protects this portion of the property from erosion as much of the <br /> drainage in this area follows the slope. This is a difficult area to maintain due to the steep slope <br /> that exists. <br /> Weinberger stated the hardcover worksheets completed by the surveyor include areas that were <br /> called hardcover but under definition are not necessarily hardcover because a plastic underlayment <br /> does not exist. One area is located near the driveway and the second area is located in front of the <br /> house on the lakeside. Staff is not recommending that the Applicants remove any of this hardcover <br /> since it protects the area from erosion. Weinberger noted that the hardcover in the 75-250'setback <br /> comprises 30.24 percent,which still requires a variance. <br /> • Weinberger stated all other lot requirements are met by the proposal and is not subject to average <br /> lakeshore setback. The Planning Commission needs to determine whether this type of development <br /> would have been approved if the Applicants had obtained the appropriate permits before <br /> construction of the deck. <br /> City Staff is recommending approval of the after-the-fact variance due to the hardship that exists on <br /> the property in that much of the hardcover that exists on the property is necessary for erosion <br /> control and some public purpose. <br /> Chair Smith inquired whether those two areas were the only two areas requested to be removed. <br /> Weinberger stated that the Scheblers have voluntarily removed some hardcover on the property. <br /> Smith inquired whether back in 1989 any other hardcover was supposed to have been removed that <br /> has not been. <br /> Weinberger stated just the driveway and the rock were requested to be removed. <br /> Schebler stated they have been attempting to clean up the property and reduce hardcover. <br /> Smith inquired whether there should be a condition that no additional hardcover be allowed on this <br /> property. <br /> Hawn stated she has a problem with this application and that hardcover needs to be further <br /> reduced. Hawn remarked she would not have granted a variance to allow the deck and would ask <br /> that the Applicants remove the deck. <br /> • <br /> Page 6 <br />