My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-15-1999 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
03-15-1999 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 3:00:57 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 3:00:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MINUTES FOR MARCH 15, 1999 <br /> • <br /> (#4) #2458 PROPOSED ZONING AMENDMENT: LR-1C-1 DENSITY CREDIT—(continued) <br /> Nancy Mead, 30 Interlocken Lane, inquired whether this item could be tabled in order to allow her <br /> brother, Paul Larson, to attend the meeting to express his concerns regarding the proposed <br /> amendment. Mead indicated her brother will be out of town for the next few days. <br /> Monica Brown, Brown Road South, stated she had a question regarding clustering. <br /> Smith stated that is one option that could be utilized. <br /> Gaffron stated that any property that took advantage of the PRD standards would have to <br /> cluster. If the resident chose to do a straight subdivision, you could have 1/2 acre lots under the <br /> proposed ordinance without having to cluster. Gaffron remarked that this proposed zoning <br /> amendment only affects the LR-1C-1 district,which is less than 30 acres. <br /> Hawn inquired if you have to do either a PRD or a subdivision so that you cannot take a two acre <br /> lot and have a three unit building with a single home. <br /> Gaffron stated if you take a two acre site, such as the Larson property, under the standard 1/2 acre <br /> zoning, you could potentially construct four units, but under standard plat, you have to exclude the <br /> area of the road, so it's likely that you would only have three units. Under a PRD, under the <br /> proposed zoning, you can have two attached units, but you cannot have a single unit under this <br /> zoning amendment. <br /> Hawn stated she was in favor of option one, but had some concerns that Larson was not in <br /> attendance at tonight's meeting to express his views. Hawn inquired whether compensation is <br /> IIIavailable to those property owners who would be affected by this ordinance. <br /> Gaffron stated the City has not offered compensation to property owners affected by zoning <br /> changes in the past. <br /> Schroeder remarked that this zoning amendment is not directed at any single piece of property. <br /> McMillan inquired whether he would be able to attend the March 22 City Council meeting. <br /> Mead commented that she expected her brother back in two to three days and that he should be <br /> able to attend Monday's meeting. <br /> Gaffron stated if the Planning Commission takes action on this item tonight, it will be presented to <br /> the City Council at the March 22 meeting. <br /> Lindquist moved, McMillan seconded, recommending that District LR-1C-1 be amended <br /> to eliminate 50 percent density credit but allow attachment of units via PRD to remain, <br /> adding Shoreland reference and revising hardcover standard. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> (#5) #2444 BRIAN AND SUSAN SCHEBLER, 1354 REST POINT CIRCLE -VARIANCE, <br /> 7:33 p.m. -8:02 p.m. <br /> Brian and Susan Schebler, Applicants, were present. <br /> III <br /> Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.