My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-17-1998 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
02-17-1998 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:49:29 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:49:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 17, 1998 <br /> • <br /> (#7 -#2341 Daniel Anderson- Continued) <br /> McMillan asked where the existing septic site is for the existing home. Gaffron said there <br /> are two proposed septic sites. Anderson clarified that the existing septic has to be <br /> removed as it is non-conforming. McMillan asked if any of the septic sites are more than <br /> 6% slope. Gaffron said all sites meet the 6% slope requirement. Additional testing for <br /> possible trench systems will be conducted this spring. Trench drainfields would require <br /> less land than the mound system sites that have been selected. Otto confirmed that there is <br /> more than adequate room for all septic sites. <br /> McMillan asked if Staff received comments from Hennepin County regarding Lots 6 and 7 <br /> being adjacent to the park. Gaffron said he had discussed the issue with Del Miller, who <br /> had no concerns. <br /> Brad Bressler reported having gone on the walking tour with the Park Commissioners. <br /> He said they determined that a 10' easement would not be sufficient with the grades found <br /> on the west side and would require retaining walls. There are also power poles close to <br /> the road that would have to be relocated. These reasons, along with the fact that an <br /> easement already exists on the east side, resulted in Park Commission's determination that <br /> the east side was the best location for a trail. Bressler identified the area determined to be <br /> the best location for the trail to cross over to the west. <br /> Bridget Hust, 820 Old C rystal Bay Road, noted that they hear cars driving down the road <br /> since their home is so close to the road. With the speeding cars, Hust felt an intersection <br /> would be required for crossover of the trail. She did not believe cars would be able to <br /> stop in the location noted by Bressler if people are crossing the road. Hust said they were <br /> not informed of the meeting when the Council decided the trail should be located on the <br /> east side. <br /> Another member of the audience indicated that it would be wise to resolve the trail <br /> location soon. This gentleman felt it would be difficult to cross the road at the location <br /> noted by Bressler as cars are traveling 40-50 mph. <br /> Francis Graham emphasized the need to protect the trees on the subject property noting <br /> the uniqueness of the woodlands. <br /> Dan Anderson said he was willing to work out a trail easement for the west side. He <br /> indicated that the 6% slope requirement for mound drainfields is not mandated by the <br /> State and felt there were alternatives available. <br /> Stoddard informed the public that the Commission will inform the police department of <br /> the speeding problem on Old Crystal Bay Road. He indicated that a decision will not be <br /> • made at this time regarding the bike trail location. <br /> 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.