My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-17-1998 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1998
>
02-17-1998 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:49:29 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:49:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 17, 1998 <br /> (#7- #2341 Daniel Anderson - Continued) <br /> Gaffron reported that members of the Park Commission and Staff walked the trail area to <br /> determine the best location for the trail. They determined that the best location was on the <br /> east side due to the topographical conditions and septic sites on the west side. Gaffron <br /> said the Park Commission is aware of the issues presented by Hust. Gaffron felt taking an <br /> easement on the subject property on the west would allow the opportunity for a trail in the <br /> future on the west side if the properties were to be sewered. He noted that taking an <br /> easement now does not determine where the trail will eventually be built. <br /> Francis Graham, 1100 Old Crystal Bay Road, indicated there were topographical issues on <br /> the east side as well. She hoped that no decision was made at this time to preclude the <br /> trail being located on the west side. <br /> Lindquist informed the public that the Commission makes a recommendation to Council. <br /> The Council makes the final decisions. He suggested the public attend the Council <br /> meeting when this topic is again discussed. <br /> Mike Dallas, 1020 Old Crystal Bay Road, asked if there were restrictions along the <br /> Lakeshore with the high elevations. Lindquist informed him of the 30' setback from the top <br /> of a bluff. The proposal meets that setback. Dallas asked about the loss of trees. <br /> • Lindquist said there would be no walkout building sites in the bluff area. The lots will <br /> have the ability to have a dock at the lake and have a walkway to the lake within the 0-75' <br /> setback. <br /> Judd Dayton, 825 Old Crystal Bay Road, asked about dock usage noting there were only <br /> 3 lakeshore lots. He questioned whether the other lots would be able to have dockage as <br /> well. Gaffron said the lakeshore property owners cannot legally grant an easement or <br /> means for dockage other than for the owners themselves. He did note the difficulty in <br /> controlling this situation. Gaffron said the City would make it clear that the City would <br /> not sanction any access for the other 4 lots to the lake; both the code and history does not <br /> allow this to occur. <br /> Smith said the revised plan is an improvement. Lindquist agreed. He indicated the need <br /> for a stormwater pond review. He also felt the 10' easement should be maintained to keep <br /> options open until a decision is made on the trail. <br /> Smith asked that the conservation easement include trees, woodlands, and natural <br /> vegetation. McMillan agreed. She questioned how it should be worded. Gaffron said this <br /> would be written prior to review by Council. <br /> • <br /> 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.