Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />WORK SESSION HELD ON DECEMBER 15, 1997 <br />• Schroeder voiced approval with the need for applicants to provide all necessary <br />information by a particular date for review to occur. The 60 day time frame begins from <br />the date of filing. Smith said the time frame assumes all information is provided. <br />Gaffron questioned whether the waiver takes away from the right of an applicant to <br />receive a conclusion to their application within the 60 time frame. Van Zomeren said no; <br />the applicant was only being put on notice. It does not refer to a waiver. Van Zomeren <br />emphasized that the applicant risks submitting applications on the deadline date as all <br />information must be complete. Van Zomeren said the survey submittal needs to be <br />1] <br />reviewed. <br />Hawn asked if the $150 renewal is per variance or total. Gaffron said he would need to <br />review it but it probably is $150 total. <br />Smith suggested an introduction letter be included. She asked to see the final form and <br />suggested color coding the application. Gaffron said the statement shows what is needed. <br />Smith said lines should be provided. <br />Pages 10, 11, and 12 were satisfactory to the Commission. <br />Smith suggested giving definitions and examples of hardships. Schroeder did not believe <br />giving examples would help. McMillan suggested applicants speak with staff about any <br />questions they may have regarding hardship. Gaffron indicated that staff writes the <br />majority of the hardships. <br />26 <br />