My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-15-1997 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
09-15-1997 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:36:14 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:36:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 15,1997 <br />( #5 - 42279 and 42280 Marc and Tracy Whitehead - Continued) <br />Gaffron said the lane to the north of Lot 1 is a dedicated public right -of -way but has never been <br />opened. The DNR is not in need of this right -of -way, and Gaffron recommended vacating the right - <br />of -way for inclusion to the property. <br />Access to the neighborhood is another issue for the Planning Commission to consider according to <br />Gaffron. The City Engineer has suggested Lyman Avenue, which is only 15 -20' wide at most should <br />be upgraded by the developer. Gaffron said the applicant proposes to dedicate public right -of -way <br />for the road but has asked Commission to consider whether the cul -de -sac is needed. The City <br />Engineer has suggested the applicant be responsible for the upgrade including costs. The applicant <br />had indicated the road likely would be torn up when sewer was installed. Gaffron indicated the <br />adjacent area is one of the ten hot spots but not scheduled for sewering at this time. The property <br />itself is not part of the delineated sewer area and is not within the MUSA. <br />Gaffron asked whether the two additional lots served by the driveway should trigger the upgrade of <br />the road and what the upgrades should include. He noted items A -H in the packet were for Planning <br />Am Commission discussion. <br />• <br />Mr. Winston said the proposal is to add two new lots for two new homes. The lots would be large <br />at 3.8 acres and 3 acres plus the existing homestead. He felt the additional traffic on Lyman would <br />be minimal and should be the concern of the City, not the applicant. Winston does not believe the <br />Whitehead's should be obligated to solve the road needs for the neighborhood. <br />Brian Palmer, 1190 Lyman Avenue, said he was not aware of the number of variances required on <br />the current plan. He questioned how many variances the Planning Commission would grant for the <br />new subdivision and whether or not they should be granted. Lindquist informed him that the lots <br />are plotted as buildable and will require some variances. Lindquist said he thought the number of <br />variances was minimal. <br />Brano Stankovsky, 1290 Lyman Avenue, said he has met with the Whiteheads and discussed the <br />purchase of Outlot A. Plans are not known for the retaining wall or driveway as yet, and he asked <br />if they were required. Gaffron indicated that they were. Stankovsky inquired about screening. <br />Gaffron said it needs to be discussed. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.