Laserfiche WebLink
• ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 15,1997 <br />( #5 - #2279 and #2280 Marc and Tracy Whitehead - Continued) <br />Gaffron reported that the application had been tabled at the August 18 meeting for revision from 4 <br />lots to 3 lots. A revised proposal has been submitted. Lyman Avenue is partially maintained by the <br />City with the easterly gravel driveway portion privately maintained. The 2 /3rds cul -de -sac has not <br />been constructed. The three lots include an existing house on one of the lots. <br />Gaffron reported that the plan reviewed in August was problematic as Lot 4 had only one septic site. <br />The Planning Commission had then recommended a 3 -lot subdivision with a cul -de -sac to the <br />driveway outlot with Lot 1 as the driveway outlot. <br />The new plan includes a cul -de -sac located near the neighboring lot line, which would have a <br />negative impact on that property. Staff suggested an outlot for buffering as well as a second outlot <br />for the driveway to serve Lot 1. The private driveway outlot makes Lot 1 a "back lot ", which must <br />be able to meet the 150% area and setback requirements. The front lot line of the back lot requires <br />a 75' setback. There is 50' currently proposed for that setback, which will require a variance. <br />Gaffron said it was important to note that the 150% requirement has to do with the impacts to the <br />front lot, and he recommends approval of that variance. <br />• Gaffron indicated the p acket includes information for discussion on how the lot meets the standards. <br />Buffering for Outlot A needs to be determined. Gaffron said he is not recommending combining the <br />two outlots because keeping them separate will help limit encroachments of the buffer. A design <br />for the driveway for Outlot B is necessary. Due to the slope east of Outlot B, a retaining wall will <br />be required. Screening of the southeast corner of Lot 1 will aid in restricting headlight glare from <br />the roadway. <br />Gaffron noted the Planning Commission had requested screening and a tree inventory for the Lot <br />3 driveway corridor. A list of plant varieties is included for Lot A for review. Driveway relocation <br />within the boundary of Lot 1 would result in impacting trees. Gaffron asked the Commission to <br />consider whether this should or should not occur. The easement would otherwise continue to be <br />used. <br />Gaffron reviewed the lot dimensions and area. The 200' lot width requirement would be met by Lots <br />1 and 2. There would be only a 180' width at the front setback line on Lot 3, requiring a variance <br />but still better than prior plans. Septic site locations have been established and have been approved <br />by Steve Weckman. Gaffron noted the applicant had suggested that with only two homes, no <br />ponding was necessary since no cul -de -sac would be built. Gaffron indicated this would have to be <br />reviewed by the City Engineer and MCWD, who will make the final determination, before final <br />approval of the subdivision. <br />• <br />3 <br />