Laserfiche WebLink
• ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JULY 219 1997 <br />( #16 - #2267 John O'Sullivan for Adam Smith Company - Continued) <br />Ericson commented that he was unable to obtain a curb cut when he requested it. O'Sullivan <br />indicated that he has closed off one curb cut, had three approved, and currently has two curb cuts. <br />Ericson asked if it would be a common curb cut for both businesses when developed. Gaffron <br />said that would be the City Engineer's recommendation but not what is being proposed. <br />O'Sullivan noted that he has 400' of frontage. <br />Lindquist asked where the applicant is in the plan for development of the church site. O'Sullivan <br />said it would be in the fall or winter at the earliest time. He said he would support the temporary <br />location status but did not feel it would be the best option if only one curb cut is allowed. <br />Schroeder asked if his objection is due to the elimination of the parking spots. O'Sullivan said it <br />was. Schroeder asked how far north the access would have to be to gain a free right turn. <br />O'Sullivan said it would not occur. O'Sullivan said the County told him he would have to make <br />the best of the intersection as it is. <br />Lindquist noted Navarre Lane was half vacated. Gaffron said it was vacated to the County road <br />right -of -way. The remaining portion is conceptually vacated pending the church site <br />development. Lindquist asked if the proposal can be accomplished with the vacation still being <br />conceptual. Gaffron said it could as it was still part of the public right -of -way. <br />Schroeder said he supports the temporary approval as it leaves options open. <br />Hawn said she is concerned with the traffic flow on the site. She feels the curb cut would <br />intensify the traffic flow. Hawn noted at the time of the restaurant approval, the applicant was <br />required to install a railing next to the doorway, install a sign, and place station markers for the <br />lanes. She indicated this was not done and compounds the safety concerns of the site. <br />O'Sullivan said the sidewalk reconfiguration resulted in the determination that no railing was <br />needed. Hawn asked who made that determination. Gaffron said he was not involved. <br />O'Sullivan said staff reviewed it and approved it. <br />Berg said she typically has seen cones located between the lanes. O'Sullivan said the cones were <br />not required. Hawn said she would have to review the minutes for the record. She had thought <br />they were to be immovable and permanent. <br />Hawn said she still has concerns regarding safety. She has viewed children running across the <br />parking lot and noted there was no sign for stopping in the walkway. Lindquist asked Hawn <br />• what she would like to see done. Hawn showed where the sign and railing were to be located. <br />23 <br />