My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-16-1997 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1997
>
06-16-1997 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:31:00 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:30:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
NnNUTJES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON 1U-NE 16, 1997 <br />• r _ 225 Bellows for Ellen and Steve Polansky - Continue-d) <br />��,�_ 0 ?lyfaureen <br />• <br />There were no public comments. <br />McMillan asked if the neighbor to the south was notified. Van Zomeren said the neighbor <br />was going to come and review the plans. Bellows said she talked with the neighbor on <br />this date. The neighbor was concerned that the proposed improvements would affect a <br />possible subdivision for the neighbor. Bellows informed her it would not. <br />McMillan asked if there would be a retaining wall by the garage. Bellows said a retaining <br />wall would be located by the comer of the garage at about 4. S' -S' height down to 3.5' to <br />maintain the driveway. <br />Schroeder moved, McMillan seconded, to recommend approval of the application due to <br />the unique nature of the property. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />( #12) #2252 - WARREN AND CHRISTINE BIELKE, 2565 DUNWOODY <br />AVENUE - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 9:12 -9:38 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />The Applicant was present. <br />Van Zomeren reported that the 1.2 acre property is located in the LR -1C, 1/2 Acre <br />Lakeshore Residential District. The proposal is to add 6' and 4' to the side and entrance of <br />an existing 2.5 car garage replacing non - structural hardcover with structural hardcover. <br />Van Zomeren said stag had been unaware that the applicants had removed plastic under <br />landscaping and had not been given credit for doing so. A previous owner was to have <br />removed said plastic as a condition of a prior application which increased the property's <br />hardcover to 35.6 0/o, The current proposal is to increase hardcover of 34.95% to 35.1 %, <br />or 2936.5 s.f. <br />Schroeder noted that the plastic should not have been there in the firstt place and does not <br />satisfy reasoning for excess hardcover. <br />Lindquist asked if the applicants were aware of the restrictions regarding fixture hardcover <br />increase limitations on the property. The applicant said they have lived there four years <br />and were aware that the plastic should have been previously removed. They then removed <br />the plastic in order to submit this proposal in order to come with an application that <br />included the hardcover amount for variance granted in 1991. Mrs. Bielke said they <br />removed more hardcover than had been required. <br />1? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.