My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-21-1997 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
01-21-1997 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:25:28 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:25:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 21, 1997 <br />( #7 - #2202 County Road 15 Improvement - Continued) <br />Should the City accept the concept of mitigating impacts to Orono wetland via <br />wetlandlstormwater projects in other cities or in other subwatersheds? How does <br />the Planning Commission feel about payments for future off -site mitigation in lieu <br />of concurrent on -site mitigation? <br />Does the Planning Commission feel more information about the functions and <br />values of these wetlands should be provided before a final decision is made on this <br />project? Would the Commission prefer to review the EAW before reaching <br />a conclusion? <br />Gaffron noted the City has not required mitigation in the past as it is a relatively new law. <br />He did note that other agencies are allowing mitigation. He questioned whether the City <br />should approve the project before the EAW process is complete. Gaffron reported that <br />Staff supports the application as it sees the need for the update of CoRd 15 and <br />conceptually recommends approval and asks the Commission to consider the issues <br />presented. <br />Lindquist asked Bruce Polaczyk if as County representative, he had any comments to <br />make. Polaczyk referred to Joel Settles, wetland expert for the County. Settles reported <br />that all impacts from the project will be replaced above a 1:1 ratio within the same sub <br />watershed, though not necessarily in Orono. He noted mitigation will occur in Painters <br />Creek in Independence and in Excelsior. Schroeder was informed that the decision where <br />the mitigation would occur came about from the State Statutes which allows for <br />replacement within the County, preferably within the same watershed but requiring local <br />approval. <br />Schroeder voiced concern with approval of additional pavement when the City has strived <br />to reduce any hardcover which would impact the lake. He noted that approval of this <br />application greatly outweighs the mass of single hardcover applications for such <br />improvements as decks and driveways on lake shore properties. Gaffron noted that <br />Settles had met with the City years ago to discuss much of the same issues as Schroeder is <br />bringing up. <br />Smith asked why the sites in Independence and Excelsior were decided upon. Settles <br />noted that the sites are in the same watershed and payment is allowed in lieu of on -site <br />mitigation. If there is no room for mitigation, contribution for creation of a pool is <br />allowed which would allow the most treatment for the contribution made. He noted that <br />Excelsior is the only city with an agreement for regional ponding. Orono has not come to <br />a written agreement as of yet. <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.