Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 1996 <br />• <br />( #7 - #2192 Robert Beutler - Continued) <br />During the discussion, Mr. Beutler suggested restrictions be placed on the abstract and <br />structure taken down if sold. Hawn questioned whether a structure in such good <br />condition should be required to be removed. Mrs. Beutler noted that it was their intent to <br />tie in the exteriors of the buildings to match. Berg suggested taking out the plumbing in <br />the structure. Mr. Beutler intends to use the structure as office space but would not <br />include any client visits. The main intent is for storage and work shop. Mrs. Beutler <br />noted that neither structure would be large but were located on a large parcel. Hawn <br />questioned how the Commission would respond if another application was presented in <br />the future with a structure in poor condition. Hawn was of the opinion that the plumbing <br />should remain if the building also remained. <br />Lindquist asked if the applicants would be satisfied with the bathroom plumbing remain <br />and the kitchen plumbing removed. The applicants indicated that they would find this <br />satisfactory. <br />Lindquist moved, McMillan seconded, to approve Application #2192 with the <br />understanding that the plumbing would be removed with the exception of the sink and <br />stool in the bathroom. <br />• Hawn suggested the restrictive covenant be signed also. <br />It was noted that the well will also serve the new residence. <br />McMillan questioned whether the value of the property would be reduced by elimination <br />of these plumbing fixtures. <br />Hawn asked if a conditional use permit would be required. Mabusth said the only <br />approval required was for the lot width variance and the restrictive covenant would be <br />filed on the deed. <br />Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 1, Hawn, who indicated that she did not feel the code was clear and <br />questioned how another applicant would be dealt with under similar circumstances if the <br />structure was not in good condition. <br />( #8) #.2193 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT, 4680/4700 <br />CIREE)KWOO'D TRAIL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING <br />9:26 -9 :51 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />• The Applicant was represented by Tom Maple and Andrew Syverson. <br />17 <br />