My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-16-1996 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
01-16-1996 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 1:57:38 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 1:57:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 16, 1996 <br />•( #8 - #2088 Stephen Gardiner - Continued) <br />Mabusth reported that the vacation application was separated from the variance <br />application. Mabusth said she was told by the homeowners' association president, Lee <br />Harrin, that a letter was sent to each Plannning Commissioner advising of their decision to <br />have no claim of interest in the right -of -way to be vacated. Members of the Planning <br />Commission reported that they had not received any such letter. Gardiner showed <br />Mabusth an agreement signed by Harrin as representative for the homeowners giving up <br />all rights of the alley way. Gardiner provided a copy of the agreement. Gardiner noted <br />that the garage would be modified or destroyed to ensure its distance of IS' from the <br />property line. <br />Schroeder asked if it was critical for the applicants to receive approval from the <br />homeowners' association. Mabusth said it was important for Gardiner and Stephens in <br />order to develop realistic improvement plans. Mabusth also commented on the question <br />of any legal claim by the property owner to the north and east on the vacated right of way <br />as that property was not part of the original Ottoville plat. <br />Mabusth also noted that Gopher I has been alerted, and applicant staked out the alleyway <br />for the utility companies to review. Confirmation of the location of any utilities is <br />necessary before the vacation can be approved. <br />Hawn noted that the dispersal is completed by the County, and it is their final <br />responsibility and not the City. Mabusth agreed. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2088 for <br />vacation of 30' alleys as oiginally dedicated in the plat of Ottoville Lake Minnetonka <br />subject to the vacation petition not being scheduled before the Council until the City has <br />received a report from the utility companies confirming whether utilities are located within <br />the unimproved public right -of -way. If utilities exist, applicant is to provide easements <br />over all existing utilities. The applicant's surveyor is to provide a complete legal <br />description for the vacation of the 30' alley for the official resolution of the City. Gardiner <br />noted his understanding of the conditions set forth. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />(#9) #2095 STEPHEN M. ENGLAND, 3855 CHERRY AVENUE - RENEWAL <br />VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 7:15 -7:17 P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />The Applicant was present. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.