My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-20-1995 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
11-20-1995 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 1:55:26 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 1:55:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />r� <br />L <br />• <br />vii`Vi1 F;: li -F TT 0R iN iry'T,r�N114 NVik'i -! ���A4I v <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEiVusEK Lu. P995 <br />(#41 447nRl; i N:'aij.irai tcesoul cCs - fU onT111 -1 feu f <br />Gaffron inquired about the construction schedule. Linnell said it would next go to the <br />Council in December. If no maior chanizes were necessary- the final plans would be <br />drafted in January and February with bidding for early spring. Construction would begin <br />in Mav and completed during the summer. <br />No formal action was required at this meeting. <br />Wigen asked if a motion could be made on signage regarding trespassing. He was told <br />these concerns would be addressed by Staff. <br />Lindquist asked that the comments be passed on to the Council. Peterson closed the <br />public information meeting. <br />( #5) #2088 WINFIELD STEPHENS, 3770 BAYSIDE ROAD - <br />VARIANCES/VACATION OF PI BLIC ROAD - 9:06 -9:35 P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />The Applicant was present. <br />Mabusth reported that the application was for the vacation of a 30' alley and setback <br />variances for maior additions to existing residence. The pronerty is made un of 4 separate <br />parcels and involves an improvement plan. Existing on the property is a 1 -1/2 story home <br />with a garage that is located totally within the 30' alley. The improvement consists of two <br />options, option #1 involves an addition to the south side and option #2, an addition to the <br />east. The Staff memo was said to discuss the setbacks and hardcover for the property. <br />Peterson said there would appear to be no major concern as long as the applicant was able <br />to acquire the alley. <br />Mabusth advised from calls she received, it appeared that the adjacent owners may make <br />claim to the alley. Mabusth said she had spoken with Dennis Hill at the County, who said <br />the entire alley would probably be granted to the applicant as owner of lots 2 and 3. <br />Mabusth said she had spoken with Hill again after calls had been received from the <br />neighbors, and he advised that the matter may have to be further studied. Hill informed <br />Mabusth if the neighbors pressed for a piece of the allev. these claims may be raised durinu <br />a required legal proceeding. <br />Peterson asked if the application was not one step ahead of itself. He asked if Staff was <br />awaiting information on utilities. The City Engineer reported there were no sewer lines <br />encroaching the alley, and there are no power poles. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.