My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-20-1995 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
11-20-1995 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 1:55:26 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 1:55:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 20, 1995 <br />( #4 - #2085 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources - Continued) <br />Dan Wigen, 3410 North Shore Drive (2nd house west of the access), asked if there were <br />plans for an access to Crystal Bay and was told no. He asked if people would somehow <br />be discouraged from doing so. He was told there would be no improvement at that area <br />and traffic will limit people going across to that area. Wigen said people are now parking <br />in the landing and using his dock for fishing. He would like enforcement and education <br />such as signs stipulating private and not public property along that area. He also had a <br />concern with traffic and use of private driveways. He was also concerned with <br />snowmobilers using the ramp by crossing from Crystal Bay. Peterson said neither had <br />been discussed but felt the steep banks would discourage snowmobilers and landscaping <br />could also slow them down. Killien said the area could be posted for no parking in the <br />winter as the landing would be closed during that time. No other barriers would be <br />installed, however. <br />Ken Rolland, 4119 Oak Street, was concerned with traffic and asked if there was a <br />possibility for a traffic stoplight. Peterson said this had not been discussed and was a <br />County issue. Rolland said he was concerned with eastbound cars with boats making a <br />left turn onto Tonkawa. Gaffron thought there was room for perhaps three cars to stack. <br />Killien said there would be room for 4 cars with trailers. Killien asked Rolland if his <br />concern was with CoRd 51 or Tonkawa. Rolland said he was just asking in general. <br />Linnell said the County never brought up the issue of a stoplight, and south bound <br />Tonkawa was considered for just two lanes. He said it could be explored if necessary. <br />Gray asked if the landing was closed in winter if fish houses would be allowed to use the <br />ramp. Killien said the ramp would be posted as closed but not physically barred due to <br />liability. He said the fish houses would need to be dealt with if they became a problem, <br />and DNR has a 48 hour notification process before illegally "parked" fish houses could be <br />removed. There would also be no winter maintenance. Cars would probably need to be <br />4 -wheel drive to use the ramp. A DNR access is normally open 365 days a year but not in <br />this case. If there are problems, the DNR will look at options available. He noted that <br />there are only two DNR accesses with gates, both with unusual circumstances. Hurr <br />noted that there would be access at North Arm during the winter. <br />Smith said she liked the idea of an information board rather than signs at different <br />locations. Smith also liked the landscaping plan and would like to see one at North Arm. <br />She asked if the lights would be left on or off or on a timer. Killien said the lights were <br />angled and box shaped directed downward and on at all times. There will be three lights <br />on the site. Regarding the lack of proposed garbage cans, DNR believes in the less - <br />containers, less- trash line of thought. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.