Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 <br />( #10 - #2049 Fred Guttormson & Chic Dwight - Continued) <br />Lindquist asked why the deck and porch would be beyond the house. The applicant said <br />there was surface hardcover there already. Lindquist said the desire of the Planning <br />Commission is to remove as much hardcover in the 0 -75' zone as possible. It was noted <br />that there is a lx6' patio extention leading from the patio doors. Lindquist said the deck <br />could be replaced but the extension removed. The deck should not extend beyond the <br />house. <br />Gaffron asked the Commission if approval were given for the walkout, would this be <br />setting a precedent by allowing a change to the grade. <br />The applicant said her purpose was to On light into the lower level of the home and <br />modernize it. The applicant said it appears the grade was put in when the home was built <br />and not originally there. <br />Peterson said he saw a problem with the bench by the dock and asked applicant if they <br />would be willing to eliminate the accessory structure to gain the deck. <br />The applicant said about 1000 s.f of hardcover has been removed and felt they were being <br />• sensitive to that issue. The applicant said the property was purchased in part because of <br />the deck structure by the lake. Peterson said it would not be allowed today. The <br />applicant said she would be willing to remove the shed by the lake. <br />Lindquist asked if the deck could be 8' instead of 8'6 ". <br />Schroeder said the structural coverage should not exceed the amount on the property as it <br />exists now. He suggested the driveway extension and outhouse -size shed be removed as <br />mediation for the deck. Any additional hardcover in the loop driveway that is unnecessary <br />was also asked to be removed. The applicant said this was required to turnaround noting <br />the inability to park on Tonkawa. Berg said she used the loop area in which to turn <br />around. <br />Peterson said the applicant should be concerned with the problems being created by <br />beavers gnawing on the trees. Major erosion problems could occur in the future due to <br />the loss of these trees. <br />Peterson asked if the issue is altering the Lakeshore if the grading is changed. Gaffron said <br />it would be a conditional use but Staff saw no need for this to be done and would not <br />recommend approval for this or boulder walls. <br />Smith asked what could be done to maintain the shoreline. Gaflron said the boulder wall <br />would help erosion from coming to the house and rip -rap could be done to prevent shore <br />erosion. A Watershed District permit could be obtained to rip rap. <br />14 <br />