Laserfiche WebLink
Paul stated he would ask the Planning Commission to come out to Ivy Place in two separate vehicles, <br />with one vehicle starting at each end and then drive towards each other. Paul stated the Commissioners <br />will then see how narrow the road is. Paul stated there is no reasonable place to park pickup trucks and <br />other construction vehicles and that this will be a huge encumbrance on the neighborhood. Paul requested <br />the Planning Commission think long and hard about the impact to the neighborhood. <br />In addition, Paul stated he has a lot of reservations about how the project will get done. Paul stated in his <br />view the details need to be looked at closer before approving it. Paul requested the Planning <br />Commissioners come out to Ivy Place and view the area that is proposed to be developed. <br />Fretham stated as it relates to the wetland delineation, Page C2.0 depicts the edge of the wetland buffer <br />and it shows a 1.8 -foot distance between it with a 12 -foot driveway. <br />Barnhart stated the comment was related to the easement and it appears that the 1.8 feet is from the edge <br />of the wetland and that the 12 -foot driveway goes over the edge of the easement. Barnhart suggested the <br />applicant confirm those measurements prior to appearing before the City Council. <br />Fretham stated they can also move the driveway further over. <br />Barnhart stated that may be necessary. <br />White indicated he measured from the furthest the road can go to his property and that they are taking it <br />as close as they can get to the proposed house. White stated the only direction they can go is closer to his <br />house. <br />Thiesse requested the developer confirm the measurements. <br />Fretham indicated he is in agreement with that. <br />Thiesse stated there was also a comment that the access easement predates the wetland delineation. <br />Barnhart stated there seems to be some evidence that much of this lot was wetland back in the 1930s but <br />that there is not enough evidence for the DNR to say that it is a wetland and therefore unbuildable. The <br />