Laserfiche WebLink
AGENDA ITEM <br />Item No.: <br />Date: December 11, 2017 <br />Item Description: #17-3981, Todd and Angie Olson, 3325 Crystal Bay Road, <br />Variance — Resolution <br />Presenter: Laura Oakden Agenda Consent Agenda <br />Planner Section: <br />1. Purpose. This application is regarding variances requests for for lake yard setback, side yard <br />setback, rear yard setback, hardcover to exceed 25%, Average lakeshore setback and driveway to <br />exceed 8 feet in the shoreland overlay district. <br />2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received on 9/20/2017; it was <br />considered as complete on 11/8/2017. Therefore the 60 -Day review period expires onl/8/2017. <br />Background. Todd and Angie Olson are proposing to add an upper story to their existing home. <br />They will keep the perimeter walls and plan to remodel the interior of the home with the addition <br />of an upper story, new front porch, a wider deck and removing and replacing the driveway to <br />better serve the property. Majority of the home is currently placed within the 75' lake yard <br />setback as well as the side yard and rear yard setbacks. The upper story addition is an increase in <br />the massing of the home in these encroachments. The applicants are asking for setback variances <br />for this addition. <br />They are proposing to widen the existing deck from 11' to 21' which increases the massing in the <br />average lakeshore setback but it is proposed to encroach no closer to the lake then the existing <br />deck. They will also move the 1- stall tuck -under garage to the east (other) side of the home <br />which has room to create a 2 stall tuck -under garage. They are proposing to move the driveway <br />which alters the existing hardcover on the site. The proposed driveway will serve the double <br />garage and is 16' wide where 8' is the maximum width in the shoreland setback zone. <br />4. Planning Commission Comment. On November 20, 2017 the Planning Commission held a public <br />hearing and reviewed the application. Following the public hearing the Commission voted <br />unanimously in favor of the variance requests. <br />5. Public Comment. No comments from the public were received regarding this application. <br />6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the requested variances. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Motion to adopt or amend the approval resolution. <br />Exhibits <br />Exhibit A. Draft Resolution <br />Exhibit B. Proposed Plans <br />Exhibit C. Draft PC Minutes <br />Exhibit D. PC Staff Report <br />Prepared By: LO <br />References <br />PC Exhibits <br />Exhibit A. <br />Application <br />Exhibit B. <br />Practical Difficulties Documentation Form <br />Exhibit C. <br />Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan <br />Exhibit D. <br />Proposed Plans and Elevations <br />Exhibit E. <br />Submitted Hardcover Calculations <br />Exhibit F. <br />Adjacent Property Owner Signature <br />Exhibit G. <br />Property Owners List and Map <br />Reviewed By: J. Barnhart <br />Approved By: _Sb9 <br />