Laserfiche WebLink
FILE # 17-3972 <br />October 16, 2017 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling <br />as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. <br />8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property. The size of the subject property is not <br />conforming to the LR -1C area or width standards. <br />9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which <br />the land is located. This site is unique is that there are currently many existing <br />nonconforming encroachments. This lot is small in size for the LR -1C District. The <br />applicant is proposing to maintain the existing setbacks for the accessory structure and <br />hardcover which does not apply to other parcels. The applicant has not indicated a <br />reasonable request pertaining to the expansion for structural coverage. <br />10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the applicant. The applicant has indicated the variances are <br />necessary. <br />11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort <br />or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the <br />requested variances that meet the same setback as the existing structure and hardcover <br />seem reasonable. The structural coverage variances request does not seem in line with <br />the intent of the zoning chapter. <br />12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but <br />is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. While the location of the existing <br />detached structure and the existing hardcover of the lot may support the requested <br />setback variance and hardcover variance; the requested structural coverage variance <br />has not been shown to be supported by a demonstrable practical difficulty. <br />The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. <br />Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the <br />impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use <br />permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. <br />Practical Difficulties Statement <br />Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and <br />should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br />Practical Difficulties Analysis <br />The structural coverage of the lot is proposing to increase from existing 1,876 (17.3%) to 2,204 <br />s.f. (20.3%). Although they are proposing a conforming size of an accessory structure at 884 s.f. <br />the overall structural coverage for this parcel is exceeding the maximum 20% coverage by 40s.f. <br />The applicant has not shown any practical difficulties inherent with the property supporting the <br />increase in structural coverage. <br />The setback variances and hardcover variances are not proposing to change or increase compared <br />to the existing detached garage. The small size of the lot and practical difficulty analysis shows <br />support approving the proposed side and rear setback and hard cover variance for the new <br />detached garage. <br />Engineer Comments <br />A comprehensive review will be done at the time of the building permit. <br />