Laserfiche WebLink
FILE #17-3950 <br />17 July 2017 <br />Page 5 of 5 <br />Practical Difficulties Analysis <br />Staff finds the topography, lot size, wetland, and location of the adjacent home to the east create <br />practical difficulties supporting the requested variances. <br />Public Comments <br />To date, no public comments have been received. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the <br />property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br />2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the <br />essential character of the neighborhood? <br />3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the <br />impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? <br />4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Planning Staff Recommendation <br />The applicant is having the wetland on the property delineated. After approval by the MCWD the <br />survey will be updated and ready for permitting. Planning Staff recommends approval. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A. Application <br />Exhibit B. <br />Practical Difficulties Documentation Form <br />Exhibit C. <br />Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan <br />Exhibit D. <br />Proposed Plans and Elevations <br />Exhibit E. <br />Submitted Hardcover Calculations <br />Exhibit F. <br />Septic Design <br />Exhibit G. <br />Property Owners List <br />Exhibit H. <br />Plat Map <br />