My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-14-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
08-14-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 8:22:04 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 8:08:47 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
422
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE # 17-3945 <br />17 July 2017 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />needed. Proposed hardcover for this lot is shown at 22% (9815 square feet); structural coverage is <br />shown to be 10%. <br />Outlots: <br />There are four outlots proposed. The plans differ as to their labeling. This review references the outlot <br />labels as shown on the Cardarelle survey. The existing driveway is shown as Outlot C and will be <br />widened to 25 feet once past the gates; Outlot C is 0.34 acres. Outlot B is 0.2 acre in area and is shown <br />as a possible add-on to the Huelers' property. Outlot D is 0.5 acre in area. Outlot E contains the <br />wetland and is approximately 1.1 acres in area. There is no Outlot A. <br />Issues for Discussion: <br />The applicant is proposing to utilize the existing driveway, although widening the paved width <br />of the roadway to 25 feet. The Code requires creation of a 50 foot outlot beginning at Kelly <br />Avenue and continuing to a 100 foot cul-de-sac. They show a 25 foot wide outlot for the <br />private road where a 50 foot wide outlot is required. There is a circular turnaround shown on <br />the Cardarelle Survey which may or may not be a private improvement on one or both of the <br />lots 2709 Walters Port and 2710 Pence. The applicant should clarify the plan. Fire Marshal <br />James Van Eyll has reviewed this plan and felt that generally the plan would meet their access <br />needs. Planning Commission should direct the applicant regarding the proposed private road <br />outlot width and the circular driveway turnaround. <br />2. The private road is shown to connect with Walters Port in addition to the new shared driveway <br />curb cut for 2709 Walters Port and 2710 Pence Ln. The applicant should clarify the connection <br />to Walters Port. Is it to be a through street connection? Or an emergency access which will be <br />gated most of the time? Planning Commission should ask for clarification regarding the <br />Walters Port connection. <br />3. The plan suggests the connection of the Pence Lane Drive to Walter Port Lane. While Staff is <br />generally supportive of additional transportation connections, this does introduce additional <br />impacted properties. Further, the question arises, should Walters Port be improved to city <br />code standards due to the number of connections it provides? (see Code Section 82-281 <br />Exhibit D) According to the Code, the private road outlot should be widened to 50 feet and the <br />paved width increased to 28 feet, or 24 feet at a minimum. The applicant will need to provide <br />the standard private road easements and evidence of a maintenance agreement for both <br />portions of the private road. Planning Commission should direct the applicant regarding the <br />creation of the proposed private through road. <br />4. The applicant is proposing to keep the existing entrance monuments and gate. The monuments <br />are separated by 20 feet. Entrance gates on private driveways are permitted, however a gate <br />spanning a public or private road is uncommon. According to Code Section 78-1405, entrance <br />monuments serving three or more residences must be separated by a minimum horizontal <br />width of 22 feet; a gate serving three or more residences must have a minimum horizontal <br />opening of 20 feet in the full open position. A photo of the existing gates are attached within <br />Exhibit E. The planning commission should discuss the request for a gate crossing the private <br />roadway and the proposed width of the horizontal separation. <br />S. According to the survey, proposed Outlot B is shown as a separate outlot to provide the option <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.