Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 28, 2017 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT, Continued <br />Seals reported she and Council Member Printup attended the ground breaking ceremony for the new <br />recreation center and that work will begin on the new building in the near future. Seals noted the <br />Minnesota State Fair is going on. <br />Walsh welcomed Dustin Rief as Orono's new City Administrator. <br />CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />15. CONSIDER WAIVER OF BUILDING PERMIT FEES ASSOCIATED WITH PLANNED <br />IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ICE ARENA <br />Rief stated the purpose of this item is to consider a reduction or waiver of the fees associated with the ice <br />arena improvements. <br />Reeder noted the City Council tabled action on this item at their last meeting. <br />Walsh stated the Orono Ice Arena is a nonprofit organization and that they have raised approximately <br />$1 million to complete the proposed renovations. The permit fees amount to approximately $7,500 and <br />that the ice arena association is requesting those fees be waived in whole or in part. Walsh stated since he <br />is on the board of the organization as the mayor of the City, he will be recusing himself from voting on <br />this item. Walsh noted any motion would require three out of four votes to pass. <br />Crosby stated in his view the City should take these type of cases on a case-by-case basis. Crosby stated <br />since the City Council is not a court of law, their action would not create a total precedent, and that in his <br />opinion the request is reasonable. Crosby stated the ice arena adds a lot to Orono and the organization <br />that runs it is a nonprofit. Crosby indicated he would be in favor of waiving the fee. <br />Seals noted this item was tabled at the last meeting, and since that time she has spoken with a number of <br />people, both for and against the request. Seals stated if the City waives the fees, the City would not be <br />realizing that money as income and they would be required to spend less on other items, such as roads or <br />other city services. Seals indicated she leans on the side of not approving it at this time until the City is <br />able to implement a mechanism to deal with these requests. <br />Dankey stated before the City starts waiving fees, the City should have a process in place to deal with <br />those types of requests. <br />Printup noted years ago some fees were waived but it was stopped because it became a slippery slope. In <br />addition, the City Council has worked hard over the last several months on ways to reduce fees and that in <br />his opinion it is too much of a slippery slope. <br />The City Council took no action on this item. <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />