My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-11-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
09-11-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 8:02:13 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 7:49:04 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
242
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
alleged rights as claimed in the May 1, 2017, letter from their attorney. Two factors <br />legally prevent the Whites from taking the actions suggested by Mr. Johnson in his <br />letter. <br />First, in 2012 the Whites entered into an agreement with the Lupients by which <br />the Whites stated that "we are not now and will not in the future be making any claim of <br />rights to the Lupient Property." To the extent any of the issues in the attorney's letter <br />relate to claims of adverse possession or prescriptive easements, the Whites have <br />disclaimed their interest in the Agreement with the Lupients. The Agreement with the <br />Lupients is attached as Exhibit A. <br />Second, and more importantly, as a matter of law the Whites cannot make any <br />claims for adverse possession or prescriptive easements. This property is registered <br />Torrens. As such, title to registered property cannot be gained by adverse possession or <br />prescriptive easement. Minn.Stat.§ 508.25 ("Every person receiving a certificate of <br />title ... shall hold it free from all encumbrances and adverse claims..."). The Certificate of <br />Title for this property is attached as Exhibit B. As you can see, neither the Whites nor <br />their predecessors have asserted any title interest of record on the Certificate of Title. <br />On the specific issues raised by Mr. Johnson, Lake West has the following <br />responses: <br />1. Access <br />The Easement dated September 6, 1968, and filed as Doc. No. 922012 <br />grants a perpetual 30400t wide access easement for roadway purposes <br />over the White property and for the purpose of access to and egress from <br />the Lupient property. A copy of the Easement is attached as Exhibit C. <br />The Easement contains no restrictions limiting access for any particular <br />type of ingress or egress. Ingress and egress for construction purposed on <br />the benefitted lots could clearly be contemplated under the Easement. The <br />Lupient property is two acres and contains sufficient space for <br />construction worker and equipment parking. The Easement area will only <br />be used for ingress and egress, and not for parking. Attached as Exhibit D <br />is drawing that shows the roadway easement at the bottom of the page <br />adjoining Ivy Place. <br />2. Encroachments <br />The encroachments by the Whites on the Lupient property are admitted by <br />Mr. Johnson in his May 1, 2017, letter. These encroachments are not an <br />impediment to Lake West's development of the property, but rather are a <br />problem for the Whites to reasonably resolve with their neighbor. In the <br />absence of any agreement, Lake West would be within its rights to demand <br />that the Whites remove these encroachments, which include their deck, <br />driveway, and utilities. Lake West is willing to reach an accommodation <br />with the Whites on these issues, but the parties have not yet reached an <br />agreement. Lake West is willing to allow these encroachments for the time <br />being. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.