My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-10-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
07-10-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2019 10:18:50 AM
Creation date
5/28/2019 10:08:19 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
AGENDA ITEM <br />Item No.: 13 Date: July 10, 2017 <br />Item Description: #17-3933 — Catherine Sweet, 3405 and 3407 Crystal Bay Road, <br />Vacation of Street <br />Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Agenda Planning Department <br />Development Director Section: Report <br />1. Purpose. The purpose of this item is to consider the applicants request to vacate unimproved right of <br />way adjacent to her property. <br />2. 15.99 Deadline. A decision must be made by July 29, 2017. <br />3. Background/ Summary. Per State Statute, this item requires an extended public hearing as it impacts <br />waters of the state; the DNR gets 60 days to comment on an application. The Planning commission <br />opened and continued the public hearing to July 10th. The Council must open the public hearing, receive <br />comment. <br />Catherine Sweet owns the two parcels on either side of unimproved right of way, connecting the trail to <br />the lake. This right of way was provided to the public in 1908, as part of a street vacation of right of way <br />on the east side of 3405. It was originally thought that upon vacation, both properties would receive a <br />portion of the right of way, and 3407 would have Lake Frontage. Because 3405 provided the right of <br />way, 3405 would receive all of it. For 3407 to acquire Lake Frontage, a boundary line adjustment would <br />be required. <br />Vacation of right of way requires the Council to determine that the right of way is not necessary and the <br />disposal of it is in the city's best interest. <br />4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to deny the vacation <br />request, and recommended the Council consider a relocated right of way. <br />Relocating the right of way would essentially be the property owner donating an easement, which the City <br />Council would have to accept. Staff would recommend considering such a request after a public hearing <br />on a proposed new easement. <br />5. Public Comment. The DNR has provided written comments, attached as Exhibit D. The DNR does <br />not recommend vacation of the right of way. <br />6. Staff Recommendation. Staff does not support vacation of the right of way, and staff does not <br />support relocating the right of way into an easement. Shifting the easement to the west brings it closer to <br />the N/S segment of Crystal Bay Road, reducing its effectiveness. Disposing of city property should be <br />done cautiously as future needs can shift wildly. <br />If the Council supports the vacation and shifting of the easement, staff would recommend the following <br />process/ procedure: <br />• The applicant submit a letter waiving the 60 -day review period. <br />• The applicant submit an offer of easement donation, including legal description and graphic. <br />• The Planning commission review such a donation at its' next available public hearing (August 21, <br />2017) <br />• The Council receive such recommendation. <br />Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: ��� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.