Laserfiche WebLink
FILE #17-3939 <br />15 May 2017 <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />otherfacilities as viewedfrom the surface of public waters, assuming summer, leaf -on <br />vegetation. Staff seeks verification from a licensed engineer that the proposed solution will <br />effectively stabilize the slope. <br />Public Comments <br />To date, no public comments have been received. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the <br />property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br />2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter <br />the essential character of the neighborhood? <br />3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the <br />impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? <br />4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Planning Staff Recommendation <br />The applicant has shared with staff their difficulties in finding an engineer willing to design a <br />restoration of the failure areas that did not involve completely denuding the slope and making a <br />significant cut into their yard to restore the areas. <br />Staff recommends approval of the CUP. Based the on Code Section 78-1283 and the City <br />engineer's comments staff also recommends the applicant provide a restoration plan designed <br />and certified by a registered engineer. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A. <br />Application <br />Exhibit B. <br />Existing Survey <br />Exhibit C. <br />Proposed Plans <br />Exhibit D. <br />Hardcover Calculations <br />Exhibit E. <br />Plant List <br />Exhibit F. <br />Site Photos <br />Exhibit G. <br />Aerial Photos <br />Exhibit H. <br />Property Owners List <br />Exhibit /. <br />Plat Map <br />