Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, April 17,2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />2. Does the Planning Commission have any concerns regarding mitigation of the impacts to <br />floodplain, wetlands and trees that are likely with this proposed development?: Site re -grading <br />over much of the property is anticipated with the proposed plan. <br />Access to the property for development/home construction is likely to be very difficult and will <br />likely require heavy vehicles needing to access the property on a very narrow road and minimal <br />accessibility without impacting the immediate neighbor. Contractor parking is likely to be <br />difficult. The impacts to the neighborhood during the construction process, and especially to the <br />adjoining residence, will likely be extreme. Applicant should be asked to address how these <br />issues and impacts will be mitigated. <br />4. Does the Planning Commission have any concerns regarding the lot layouts and front-lotfback-lot <br />configuration? The proposed house location on Lot 2 will require re -designation of yards in order <br />to have a southerly setback less than 45 feet. As shown, the setback from that south line is ten <br />feet and Staff would suggest that 15 feet be required per the back lot code if that is considered as <br />a side yard. <br />5. Does the Planning Commission agree that the average lakeshore setback can be established at <br />seventy-five feet from the lake for both Lots I and 2 as part of the replatting approval?? <br />6. Applicants should address possible stormwater management practices and facilities to be <br />employed both during construction and on a permanent basis. <br />7. As part of the preliminary plat review process, comments will be requested from the public <br />Works, Police and Fire Departments as to the impacts of development of this property over the <br />short term and long term. <br />Gaffron stated the goal of the sketch plan is to provide the developer with an overview of the pertinent <br />City ordinances and how they affect the proposal. <br />Thiesse asked if that is a nonconforming cul-de-sac as it relates to length. <br />Page 47 of 71 <br />