My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
05-08-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 2:42:35 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 2:27:18 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
488
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING CONDIISSION MEETING <br />Monday, March 20,2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />understands their process and concerns. Fretharn stated the MPCA's concern was more about the <br />screening buffer since that is a permanent thing and that they will want to sign off on that. Fretharn <br />indicated he has hired Wenck Engineering for that component and that he can add that point to his <br />discussions with them going into the future. <br />Gaffron asked if the WCA has a concern about the additional weight on the edges or the drainage being <br />impacted. <br />Fretharn stated their concern is adding a berm on top of the landfill area, which may make it more <br />difficult to clean the landfill up if that is found to be necessary. <br />Leskinen asked whether the applicant would restrict the materials to just road debris or whether there <br />would be materials from the demolition of a building if they were to be allowed to have other sites bring <br />in their debris. <br />Fretharn stated they would like to have discretion to bring in other materials. Fretham noted on a <br />demolition project they still have protocol they have to follow to make sure the materials that are going to <br />be recycled are clean. Fretham stated he could provide that paperwork and that he will retain it in the <br />event there is ever an audit performed. <br />Leskinen asked if it would be fair to say that it could be more than just road debris. <br />Fretharn stated potentially it could be. <br />Schoenzeit asked if he would agree to the stipulation that if other materials are brought in that it be <br />limited to concrete, asphalt, manholes, and not this other demolition material. Schoerizeit indicated he <br />would be very uninterested in recycling non -road material and non -authenticated stuff and taming this <br />site back into a dump. <br />Fretham stated they do not want to turn it back into a dump and that they consider it to be a valuable <br />property. Fretham stated if that was a stipulation, he would need to figure out whether they could live <br />with that. <br />Page 22 of 64 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.