My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
05-08-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 2:42:35 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 2:27:18 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
488
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MESUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION AMETING <br />Monday, March 20,2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Fretham stated they hope it is a three-year project, but that if it does not work after a year, they will <br />probably shut it down. Fretham stated he would like to try it for at least a year. <br />Lemke asked what will happen with the site after the process is done. <br />Fretham indicated they would need to restore the site to a similar condition as before. <br />Lemke asked whether a deal breaker would be if there is a restriction on bringing in other materials from <br />other sites. <br />Fretham stated it could be since at this time he has not gotten a commitment from the contractor on how <br />much material will be brought in. Fretham stated to his understanding the contractor is negotiating with <br />the County to do some of it onsite at the road project. If that happens, that will reduce the amount of <br />material being brought to the site. Fretharn noted he has to look at the costs of tying up the property for a <br />period of time versus the amount of materials to be brought in. <br />Lemke asked him to address the question of pollution. <br />Fretham indicated the contractor will be bringing in street materials, such as curb, concrete, asphalt, <br />manholes and pipe. Fretham stated the material is fairly clean from a pollution standpoint, and if they <br />were demoing a building, that would be a different process. <br />Landgraver noted people are concerned about the old dump. Landgraver asked what government agency <br />would look into the added weight and traffic to the site. <br />Gaffron asked N1r. Fretharn what discussions he has had with the NEPCA regarding the site. Gaff'ron <br />stated his understanding of what the gentleman questioning pollution was referring to is what happens if <br />the landfill material is pushed further out or changes the drainage characteristics of the area. Gaffron <br />stated there are a lot of things that go into a landfill and that he would like to know what the NUCA's <br />views are on the proposed use for the site. <br />Fretham. indicated they have spoken with the NIPCA but that they have not really spoken with them about <br />the recycling activities. Fretham noted he has dealt with them before on other sites and that he <br />Page 21 of 64 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.