My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
05-08-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 2:42:35 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 2:27:18 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
488
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#17-39113245 Wayzata Blvd. <br />March 20, 2017 <br />Page 3 <br />• A minimum separation distance from nearby residential structures or lot lines <br />• Minimum lot size <br />• Requirements for site and adjacent road maintenance, and traffic control measures <br />• Allowed only for government sponsored public improvement projects <br />• The Council must have the ability to deny an interim use even though it is listed <br />for a specific zoning district. Item 4 of the statute excerpt would presumably <br />allow the City to find that appropriate conditions cannot or will not be met, and <br />that becomes a basis for denial. <br />Planning Commission should consider whether there are any additional conditions that would <br />be appropriate for this use. <br />Comprehensive Plan Considerations <br />An interim use that might be appropriate on a temporary basis might not fit within the type of uses <br />for which a property is guided in the Comprehensive Plan. So, if an interim industrial -type use is <br />allowed in the zoning code as an interim use in an area guided for residential use, does that meet <br />the standard for being 'in conformity with the Comp Plan'? The City Attorney has indicated that <br />because zoning needs to be consistent with the Comp Plan, the Comp Plan technically should be <br />amended to allow interim uses that aren't conforming to the CUT guiding. This requires further <br />research by staff; potentially some text would be appropriately added to the Comp Plan during its <br />update due in 2018, That should not impact the ability to add Interim Uses to the zoning code <br />now. <br />Public Comments <br />No comments for or against the proposal have been received to date. Notification to all properties <br />within 3 5 0 feet of the property was mailed out 10 days prior to this public hearing, <br />Issues for Consideration <br />I . Does the Planning Commission conclude that the adoption of an Interim Use ordinance <br />would be a beneficial tool? <br />2. If so, does the Planning Commission find that the proposed construction staging use <br />on an interim basis is appropriate in the RR-lB (2 -acre Single -Family Rural <br />Residential) Zoning District? What specific conditions are necessary to ensure that a <br />given property is appropriate for that use? Consider the bulleted criteria above and <br />attempt to put some numerical standards in place that would limit the use to only <br />certain locations under certain conditions (as opposed to merely establishing and <br />imposing conditions on a site specific basis, which could be considered as arbitrary...). <br />3. Given the three examples from other cities, does Planning Commission have a <br />preference among them as a template to follow for the general Interim Use text? A <br />draft text amendment will be forthcoming. <br />4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends that an Interim Use section be added to the zoning code and that the RR-lB <br />District be amended to include a list of allowed Interim Uses to include "Construction staging, <br />materials and equipment storage and materials recycling" under specific conditions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.