My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
05-08-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 2:42:35 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 2:27:18 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
488
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, April 17,2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Landgraver asked if one of the neighbors had concerns with vegetation. <br />Fendlayer indicated they will be working with that neighbor to address their concerns with vegetation but <br />the final plans for the site have not yet been finalized. <br />Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 8:55 p.m. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 8:55 p.m. <br />Curtis read the following e-mail received from Christopher Jones: <br />"To the Orono Planning Commission Members: <br />I am responding to the Notice of public hearing regarding several properties that directly affect the Long <br />lake and Lake Minnetonka watersheds, and therefore, the water quality of these watersheds. <br />Specifically: 17-3918 seeks variances for lot area, lot width, lake setback, average lake setback, and a <br />0-75 foot hardcover variance. The details of this request is not included in the Public Notice so it is <br />difficult to assess their individual impacts. <br />Given the low elevation of this property in relation to Lake Minnetonka, and therefore its potential direct <br />impact on the lake's water quality, any variance approvals also must seek to include stonnwater runoff <br />remediation through best management practices. This is particularly appropriate for the hardscape <br />variance being sought. Again, because of the property's low elevations, infiltration of stormwater runoff <br />will be difficult, and this fact challenges the appropriateness of any hardscape variance request. <br />Requiring the installation of numerous rainwater gardens using deep root plants is one solution that could <br />mitigate the impact of any variances being sought; there are other best management practices available, <br />too. For example, for every square foot of variance sought, an equal square foot of rainwater garden must <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.