My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-13-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
03-13-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 1:45:07 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 1:21:35 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
563
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#17-3904 <br />21 Feb 2017 <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />approximately 170 feet from the OHWL; according to the City Code the guest cabin must be <br />located equal to or further back from the lake than the 2165 North Shore Drive home. The <br />proposed cabin is situated as close as 75 feet to the OHWL (or 67 feet for the stoop). <br />Lake Setback Variance & Hardcover Variance (Sections 78-1279 & 78-1680) <br />The proposed cabin meets the 75 -foot setback from the lake, however the northern stoop <br />access to the cabin is within the setback at 67 feet. Currently 10, 944 square feet or 6.6% of the <br />site's 13% hardcover is within the 75 -foot setback. An additional 61 square feet of hardcover is <br />proposed within the 75 -foot setback, an increase of 0.03%. The applicant is attempting to avoid <br />impacting the existing garden features on the property with the new cabin. The Code prohibits <br />hardcover improvements within 75 feet of the OHWL other than the listed improvements. The <br />stoop is not an approved hardcover allowance. <br />Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) <br />In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the <br />proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and <br />anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger offire, risk to the public safety, and the effect <br />on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider <br />recommending approvalfor variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances <br />where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique <br />to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is <br />demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning <br />Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties <br />also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. <br />Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, <br />subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a <br />variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the <br />affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary <br />use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. <br />According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: <br />1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The <br />proposed location of the guest cabin does not block lake views of the adjacent property <br />owners, and therefore is harmonious with the intent of the Ordinance. However, the <br />requested lake setback and hardcover variance for the stoop are not consistent with <br />the goals to prohibit structu ra 1/ha rd cover improvements near the lake. <br />2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The average lakeshore setback <br />variance is consistent with the goals in the comprehensive plan to protect lake views. <br />The additional hardcover resulting from the stoop encroachment is relatively minimal. <br />The overall hardcover level of the property is over 10% less than is permitted resulting <br />in sufficient surface water filtration. <br />3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. <br />a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not <br />permitted by the official controls; The variance requests are residential in nature <br />and are reasonable considering the unique nature of the property as a large <br />peninsula on the lake. The relatively large flood hazard area and existing <br />improvements on the property creates difficulties in locating a conforming <br />structure. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.