Laserfiche WebLink
FILE #16-3875 <br />October 17, 2016 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />with the homes on either side, though there are smaller homes in the <br />neighborhood. <br />Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be <br />granted as follows: <br />4. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property. The location of the watermain through the <br />lot, and not within an easement does impact the property, and the ability for the owner <br />to improve the lot. This is peculiar to the subject lot. The small lot does add challenge <br />to reasonable improvements for the property. <br />5. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which <br />the land is located. The watermain does not impact other properties in the area the <br />same way. This watermain effective makes the side yard setback 19-33 feet, <br />depending on the location of the watermain. Other lots in the area have received <br />variance to improve the properties. <br />6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the applicant. The lot permits approximately 2400 square <br />feet of buildable area. It seems likely that some variance would be necessary to build <br />a home with the typical amount of covered parking and the amount of living space <br />consistent with the neighborhood. <br />7. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort <br />or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. There has <br />been no evidence to suggest that the variances would impact the health, safety, and <br />comfort of adjacent parcels or the city at large. The City has received some comment <br />regarding the care and preservation of the gravel access road, primarily through a <br />construction impact standpoint. An inspection of the road should be completed prior <br />to construction to establish a baseline. <br />8. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, <br />but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The applicant appears to propose <br />a home that minimizes encroachment into the lake zone (average lake and lake yard). <br />The Planning Commission should discuss whether the level of encroachment is <br />appropriate. <br />The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. <br />Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the <br />impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use <br />permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. <br />Practical Difficulties Statement <br />Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and <br />should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br />Analysis <br />The proposed improvement seems consistent with recent neighborhood improvements. The <br />encroachment into the 75 lake yard is greater than the current encroachment, but will have <br />negligible visual impact to the lake. To lessen the encroachment, the house would have to be <br />redesigned, and likely the garage shifted to the north side of the lot. A rear yard variance is likely <br />