My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-13-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
02-13-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 1:03:50 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 12:50:49 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
382
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Tuesday, January 17, 2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Staff would support the variance for the connection since there will not be a substantial change for the adjacent property <br />owner. Staff did receive one phone call from another neighbor asking for clarification on the address but he did not <br />express any concerns with the proposed project. <br />The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. <br />John Daly, Revision, LLC, stated he would be available to answer any questions the Planning Commission may have. <br />Schoenzeit asked whether the existing garage has frost footings so it can be attached. <br />Daly indicated they do not know that at this point. The existing structure has a driveway and sidewalks that wrap all the <br />way around it. The current setback from the property on one side of the structure is 1.3 feet and they are not able to <br />increase that at this point. Daly stated there are footings there so it is not a slab on grade but that they will not know if <br />there are frost footings until they dig down. Daly stated at this point the garage appears to be in good condition. <br />Curtis stated the Building Code would require footings four feet deep. <br />Lemke asked whether the City Engineer has reviewed the footings._ <br />Curtis stated the City Engineer did not review that but that he has taken a preliminary look at the grading plan and did <br />not note any concerns. <br />Lemke asked how the garage was constructed in the first place with that setback. <br />Curtis indicated the garage has been there quite a while and that Staff at this point would consider it a legal <br />nonconforming structure. <br />Daly stated the house was originally constructed sometime in the 1930s. Daly stated their goal is to maintain the <br />characteristics of the home and keep it as an older style cottage on the lake. <br />Landgraver asked if there is any way to reduce the hardcover to 25 percent. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.