Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Tuesday, January 17, 2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />3. #17-3887 REVISION, LLC, ON BEHALF OF GEOFFREY AND STEPHANIE MARTHA, 2092 <br />SHADYWOOD ROAD, VARIANCES, 6:40 P.M. — 6:58 P.M. <br />John Daly, Revision, LLC, and Stephanie Martha, Applicant, were present. <br />Curtis noted revised calculations and a survey have been placed before the Planning Commission this evening regarding <br />this application. Those revisions were submitted earlier today. <br />Curtis stated the property currently contains a small house and garage. The applicant is requesting a side setback <br />variance and a Tier 1 hardcover variance in order to construct improvements to make the existing house and garage more <br />functional. <br />The applicants initially requested a hardcover variance to permit 25.7 percent hardcover. Currently the site has 25.6 <br />percent hardcover. The allowable hardcover in this district is 25 percent. After reviewing Staff's recommendations, the <br />applicant revised their plans with a reduced hardcover of 25.5 percent. The service door landing was omitted, the <br />driveway was narrowed down, and a proposed patio was eliminated. <br />The applicants are also requesting a side setback variance. The applicant proposes to connect an existing detached <br />garage that will be situated 1.3 feet from the south side lot line to the home with an addition. This connection would <br />result in the detached garage becoming part of the principal structure. The existing home is currently conforming with <br />respect to setbacks, but the connection would make the principal structure nonconforming as the house would no longer <br />meet the required 10 -foot side setback. <br />The structural coverage level is proposed to increase by over 1,000 square feet, and although conforming to the massing <br />limitations, it results in the need for a variance to increase hardcover over the existing nonconforming level, 470 square <br />feet in excess of the permitted level. Initially Staff had concerns about the resulting hardcover increase, but with the <br />revised plan, Staff does not have any concerns. <br />With respect to the setback variance for the principal structure connection, the location of the existing structures may <br />support the variance. The applicant should be asked to describe in detail the intended project. <br />