My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-11-2018 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2018
>
06-11-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 12:25:15 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 11:50:51 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
669
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, May 21, 2018 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Dan Carlson, applicant's representative, stated the reason the extra dirt is going to be moved is because <br />the current home is in front of the front yard setback and the house needs to be demolished and that area <br />filled. <br />Curtis noted they are proposing to raise the area adjacent to the street to accommodate the access on the <br />lower level as well as having a main garage access. <br />Carlson noted part of the fill is due to the old foundation. <br />Thiesse pointed out it also appears there is a significant amount of fill for the driveway up behind the <br />retaining wall. <br />Carlson agreed some fill will be necessary for the driveway. Carlson stated there are already three other <br />neighbors in the area that have a second driveway access. <br />Curtis noted that would be an issue for the City Council and not the Planning Commission. <br />Landgraver asked if the applicant is in agreement with the recommendations listed in the Staff report. <br />Carlson indicated they are. <br />Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 6:41 p.m. <br />Ryan Blackwell, 80 Smith Avenue, stated they live across the street from this property and that they have <br />three concerns. Blackwell asked where the second driveway is going to be in relation to his driveway. <br />Blackwell noted there is a corner approximately 100 feet down the street from his driveway. <br />Curtis illustrated the approximate location of the driveway and noted it will not be directly across from <br />Mr. Blackwell's driveway. Curtis stated the applicant is not showing any grading in that area except for <br />minimal grading and the removal of trees. Curtis noted the heavy lines on the plan depict the new grades. <br />Blackwell stated in front of the house right now and all the way down the property line there is <br />approximately a seven to eight -foot berm. Blackwell stated if the berm is capped at seven feet and the <br />house is built on top of that, he has a concern that he will be in a valley since the other house is raised <br />three feet. <br />Curtis indicated the applicant is not proposing to grade anything beyond the driveway. <br />Blackwell asked if the driveway will be cut through the berm. <br />Curtis indicated it will be and that the grade beyond the driveway is not proposed to be raised. <br />Thiesse asked if it is a single -story house. <br />Curtis stated it is. Curtis stated the house itself will be taller on the property but the grade from the house <br />to the road is not going to be changed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.